Sherwood C P, Abdelilah Y, Crandall J R, Stevens S L, Saggese J M, Eichelberger M R
Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2004;48:303-21.
Current forward facing (FF) child restraint designs use LATCH and ISOFIX systems to couple the restraint to the vehicle. Rear facing (RF) child restraints, however, have multiple coupling methods that vary by manufacturer and country of origin. Sled tests were performed with the CRABI 12 month dummy in six different RF attachment conditions. The performance of the rear facing child restraints (restraint kinematics, head accelerations, and neck loads) was highly dependent on the coupling method used. The results were also compared to a FF LATCH restraint.
当前的前向（FF）儿童约束装置设计使用下锚式儿童安全座椅固定系统（LATCH）和国际标准固定系统（ISOFIX）将约束装置与车辆连接。然而，后向（RF）儿童约束装置有多种连接方法，这些方法因制造商和原产国而异。使用12个月大的CRABI假人在六种不同的后向连接条件下进行了雪橇试验。后向儿童约束装置的性能（约束装置运动学、头部加速度和颈部负荷）高度依赖于所使用的连接方法。结果还与前向LATCH约束装置进行了比较。
