• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光固化与自固化正畸树脂之间粘结强度的研究

A study of bond strength between light- and self-cured orthodontic resin.

作者信息

Wang W N, Meng C L

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Apr;101(4):350-4. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80328-2.

DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80328-2
PMID:1532686
Abstract

Light-cured orthodontic composite resin has been widely advertised recently for use in bonding. However, the curability of light-cured resin when light waves are diffused through metal, ceramic, or resin brackets is doubtful and questionable. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a visible light source in curing the resin under a solid metal bracket, compared the tensile bond strength at different exposures, and analyzed the broken interface distribution between light-cured resin with various light exposure times and self-cured resin. The bond strength results revealed that the difference between light-cured resin (Transbond) with 60, 40, and 20 seconds of light exposure, respectively, and self-cured resin (Concise) was 1.05, 0.92, 0.61, and 0.71 kg/mm2, respectively. The bond strength of Transbond with 60 and 40 seconds of light exposure was greater than both the bond strength of Transbond with 20 seconds of light exposure and the strength of the self-cured resin of Concise, with statistical significance (p less than 0.01). There were also no statistical differences between Transbond with 60 and 40 seconds of light exposure or Transbond with 20 seconds of light exposure and Concise. The bond failure interfaces were located between the bracket and the resin, within the resin itself, or between the resin and the enamel. Tooth fragmentation was rarely found. There were no statistical differences (p greater than 0.05) among broken interfaces. This indicates that visible light is powerful in curing the visible light-activated composite resin under solid metal brackets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

光固化正畸复合树脂最近被广泛宣传用于粘结。然而,当光波通过金属、陶瓷或树脂托槽扩散时,光固化树脂的可固化性令人怀疑。本研究评估了可见光源在实心金属托槽下固化树脂的有效性,比较了不同照射时间下的拉伸粘结强度,并分析了不同光照时间的光固化树脂与自固化树脂之间的断裂界面分布。粘结强度结果显示,分别光照60秒、40秒和20秒的光固化树脂(Transbond)与自固化树脂(Concise)之间的差异分别为1.05、0.92、0.61和0.71kg/mm²。光照60秒和40秒的Transbond粘结强度大于光照20秒的Transbond粘结强度以及Concise自固化树脂的强度,具有统计学意义(p小于0.01)。光照60秒和40秒的Transbond之间或光照20秒的Transbond与Concise之间也无统计学差异。粘结失败界面位于托槽与树脂之间、树脂内部或树脂与牙釉质之间。很少发现牙齿碎裂。断裂界面之间无统计学差异(p大于0.05)。这表明可见光在实心金属托槽下固化可见光活化复合树脂方面具有强大作用。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
A study of bond strength between light- and self-cured orthodontic resin.光固化与自固化正畸树脂之间粘结强度的研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Apr;101(4):350-4. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80328-2.
2
Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.三种粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽之间的剪切粘结强度比较。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):457-62. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0457:COSBSO>2.3.CO;2.
3
Bond strength with various etching times on young permanent teeth.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Jul;100(1):72-9. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70052-X.
4
Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.使用等离子弧光和树脂增强玻璃离子水门汀进行正畸托槽粘结
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jul;120(1):58-63. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.115148.
5
Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.使用不同光固化和自固化粘结剂时正畸托槽的粘结强度
Angle Orthod. 2003 Feb;73(1):56-63. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0056:BSOOBU>2.0.CO;2.
6
Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.消毒后金属与陶瓷托槽的粘结强度:一项体外研究。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):836-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[836:BSODMA]2.0.CO;2.
7
An in vitro study of the bond strength of two light-cured composites used in the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to molars.一项关于两种用于正畸托槽与磨牙直接粘结的光固化复合材料粘结强度的体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Nov;102(5):418-26. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(05)81188-6.
8
Effects of surface treatments, thermocycling, and cyclic loading on the bond strength of a resin cement bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic.表面处理、冷热循环和循环负载对树脂水门汀与锂硅玻璃陶瓷粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):208-17. doi: 10.2341/11-076-L. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.光固化填充封闭剂对用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.024.
10
[Relationship between length of resin tag and bond strength of bonding adhesive].[树脂突长度与粘结剂粘结强度的关系]
Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi. 1990;17(4):383-99.

引用本文的文献

1
An In Vitro Comparison of the Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial and Deep Dentin, Treated With Er:YAG Laser Irradiation or Acid-Etching.用铒钇铝石榴石激光照射或酸蚀处理后,复合材料与表层和深层牙本质粘结强度的体外比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Summer;7(3):167-171. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.29. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
2
Shear bond strength of orthodontic color-change adhesives with different light-curing times.不同光固化时间的正畸变色黏合剂的剪切粘结强度
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 May-Jun;12(3):265-70.