Suppr超能文献

危重症婴儿细支气管炎干预措施的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Efficacy of interventions for bronchiolitis in critically ill infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Davison Caroline, Ventre Kathleen M, Luchetti Marco, Randolph Adrienne G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, St. George's Hospital, Tooting, London, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;5(5):482-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000128891.54799.67.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Viral bronchiolitis is the leading cause of respiratory failure among infants in the United States. Currently, the mainstay of treatment is supportive care. The effectiveness of treatments used for mechanically ventilated infants with bronchiolitis is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the strength of the evidence supporting the use of currently available treatments for critically ill infants with bronchiolitis.

DATA SOURCE

We searched PubMed, citations of relevant articles, personal files, and conference proceedings, and we contacted experts in the field.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials evaluating any therapy for bronchiolitis that included children in an intensive care unit.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodologic quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 2,319 citations were screened, and 16 randomized, controlled trials were included. There were three trials of surfactant, three of ribavirin, three of immune globulin, three of systemic corticosteroids, and one each of vitamin A, interferon, erythropoietin, and heliox. A meta-analysis of the three surfactant studies showed a strong trend toward a decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation of 2.58 days (95% confidence interval, -5.34 to 0.18 days; p =.07) and a significant decrease of 3.3 intensive care unit days (95% confidence interval, -6.38 to -0.23 days; p =.04). A meta-analysis of the three systemic corticosteroid studies showed no overall effect on duration of mechanical ventilation when all three trials were combined (-0.62 day; 95% confidence interval, -2.78 to 1.53 days; p =.57). We identified one published meta-analysis of three ribavirin studies showing a significant decrease in ventilator days with ribavirin (-1.2 days; 95% confidence interval, -0.2 to -3.4 days; p =.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there are no clearly effective interventions available to improve the outcome of critically ill infants with bronchiolitis. Surfactant seems to be a promising intervention, and corticosteroids or ribavirin may also be beneficial.

摘要

背景

在美国,病毒性细支气管炎是婴儿呼吸衰竭的主要原因。目前,治疗的主要手段是支持性护理。用于机械通气的细支气管炎婴儿的治疗效果尚不清楚。

目的

评估支持使用现有治疗方法治疗重症细支气管炎婴儿的证据强度。

数据来源

我们检索了PubMed、相关文章的参考文献、个人档案和会议记录,并联系了该领域的专家。

研究选择

评估任何治疗细支气管炎方法的随机对照试验,试验对象包括重症监护病房的儿童。

数据提取

两名审阅者独立提取数据并评估方法学质量。

数据综合

共筛选了2319篇文献,纳入16项随机对照试验。其中有3项关于表面活性剂的试验、3项关于利巴韦林的试验、3项关于免疫球蛋白的试验、3项关于全身用皮质类固醇的试验,以及各1项关于维生素A、干扰素、促红细胞生成素和氦氧混合气的试验。对3项表面活性剂研究的荟萃分析显示,机械通气时间有显著缩短趋势,缩短2.58天(95%置信区间,-5.34至0.18天;p=0.07),重症监护病房住院天数显著减少3.3天(95%置信区间,-6.38至-0.23天;p=0.04)。对3项全身用皮质类固醇研究的荟萃分析显示,将所有3项试验合并后,对机械通气时间无总体影响(-0.62天;95%置信区间,-2.78至1.53天;p=0.57)。我们发现一项已发表的对3项利巴韦林研究的荟萃分析显示,利巴韦林可显著减少呼吸机使用天数(-1.2天;95%置信区间,-0.2至-3.4天;p=0.2)。

结论

目前,尚无明确有效的干预措施可改善重症细支气管炎婴儿的预后。表面活性剂似乎是一种有前景的干预措施,皮质类固醇或利巴韦林可能也有益处。

相似文献

2
Surfactant therapy for bronchiolitis in critically ill infants.危重症婴儿毛细支气管炎的表面活性剂治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD005150. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005150.pub2.
5
Heliox for croup in children.氦氧混合气治疗儿童喉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub6.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

3
Acute Viral Bronchiolitis: A Narrative Review.急性病毒性细支气管炎:一篇叙述性综述
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2020 Sep 2;12(2):79-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715852. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Rational use of mucoactive medications to treat pediatric airway disease.合理使用黏液促排药物治疗儿科气道疾病。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Nov;36:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

4
8
Respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza virus.呼吸道合胞病毒和副流感病毒。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 21;344(25):1917-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200106213442507.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验