Ventre K, Haroon M, Davison C
Primary Children's Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 100 N. Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84113, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD005150. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005150.pub2.
Viral bronchiolitis is a common cause of respiratory failure in infants and children, and accounts for a significant portion of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions during seasonal epidemics. Currently there is no evidence to support the use of anything but supportive care for this disease. Surfactant is a potentially promising therapy; alterations in its composition have been described in bronchiolitis, and it may play a role in the host immunity for this disease.
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of exogenous surfactant for the treatment of bronchiolitis in mechanically ventilated infants and children.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006); MEDLINE (1966 to Week 1, February 2006); and EMBASE (1990 to September 2005). We reviewed reference lists of relevant articles and contacted experts in the field.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surfactant with placebo or surfactant with no surfactant in mechanically ventilated infants and children with viral bronchiolitis.
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Unpublished data were requested from trial authors when necessary.
Three trials containing a total of 79 patients met the inclusion criteria. No mortality or adverse effects associated with surfactant administration were reported in any of these trials. In the three trials, use of surfactant was associated with a decrease in duration of mechanical ventilation by 2.6 days (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.34 to 0.18 days; P value 0.07) and a decrease in ICU length of stay by 3.3 days (95% CI -6.38 to -0.23 days; P value 0.04). In two studies with 59 patients, in which duration of mechanical ventilation in the control groups was more comparable, surfactant was associated with a decrease in ventilator days by 1.21 days (95% CI 0.75 to 1.67 days) and a decrease in ICU stay by 1.81 days (95% CI 1.19 days to 2.42 days). Individually the studies reported some short term benefit of surfactant on pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Available data on surfactant were not sufficient to provide reliable estimates of its effects in mechanically ventilated infants and children with bronchiolitis. Future studies should be adequately powered and will need to address unresolved questions regarding which surfactant preparation may be best suited for the treatment of bronchiolitis, the appropriate dose and administration interval, and how the choice of ventilator strategy may modify its effects.
病毒性细支气管炎是婴幼儿呼吸衰竭的常见病因,在季节性流行期间占重症监护病房(ICU)收治病例的很大一部分。目前没有证据支持对此疾病使用除支持治疗以外的任何治疗方法。表面活性剂是一种潜在的有前景的治疗方法;在细支气管炎中已描述了其成分的改变,并且它可能在该疾病的宿主免疫中起作用。
本综述的目的是评估外源性表面活性剂治疗机械通气的婴幼儿细支气管炎的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(2006年第1期《Cochrane图书馆》);MEDLINE(1966年至2006年2月第1周);以及EMBASE(1990年至2005年9月)。我们查阅了相关文章的参考文献列表并联系了该领域的专家。
比较表面活性剂与安慰剂或表面活性剂与无表面活性剂在机械通气的患有病毒性细支气管炎的婴幼儿中的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位作者独立提取数据并评估试验质量。必要时向试验作者索取未发表的数据。
三项共纳入79例患者的试验符合纳入标准。在这些试验中,均未报告与表面活性剂给药相关的死亡或不良反应。在这三项试验中,使用表面活性剂使机械通气时间缩短2.6天(95%置信区间(CI)-5.34至0.18天;P值0.07),ICU住院时间缩短3.3天(95%CI -6.38至-0.23天;P值0.04)。在两项共59例患者的研究中,对照组的机械通气时间更具可比性,表面活性剂使通气天数缩短1.21天(95%CI 0.75至1.67天),ICU住院时间缩短1.81天(95%CI 1.19天至2.42天)。各项研究分别报告了表面活性剂在肺力学和气体交换方面的一些短期益处。
关于表面活性剂的现有数据不足以可靠估计其对机械通气的患有细支气管炎的婴幼儿的影响。未来的研究应有足够的样本量,并且需要解决一些未解决的问题,例如哪种表面活性剂制剂可能最适合治疗细支气管炎、合适的剂量和给药间隔,以及呼吸机策略的选择如何改变其效果。