Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术对比

Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Gordon S, Wilkins E

机构信息

Fertility and Endoscopy Center and Laser Endoscopy Institute, Atlanta, GA 30342.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1992 Mar;37(3):247-50.

PMID:1532990
Abstract

The perioperative and postoperative courses of hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were compared for 10 women who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and 10 who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Although laparoscopic hysterectomy took longer (160 versus 102 minutes), the women undergoing it had a shorter duration of hospitalization (2.4 versus 4.4 days), more rapid recuperation (3 versus 5 weeks) and fewer complications. These preliminary results suggest that in the hands of experienced operative laparoscopists, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy for selected candidates.

摘要

对10例行全腹子宫切除术的女性和10例行腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的女性,比较了子宫切除术伴或不伴双侧输卵管卵巢切除术的围手术期和术后过程。虽然腹腔镜子宫切除术耗时更长(160分钟对102分钟),但接受该手术的女性住院时间更短(2.4天对4.4天),恢复更快(3周对5周)且并发症更少。这些初步结果表明,在经验丰富的腹腔镜手术医生手中,对于选定的患者,腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术优于腹式子宫切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验