Zech Christoph J, Herrmann Karin A, Huber Armin, Dietrich Olaf, Stemmer Alto, Herzog Peter, Reiser Maximilian F, Schoenberg Stefan O
Institute of Clinical Radiology, Munich University Clinics, Grosshadern, Germany.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Sep;20(3):443-50. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20127.
To compare high-resolution T2-weighted images of the liver with and without integrated parallel acquisition techniques (iPAT) using either breath-hold sequences in combination with prospective acquisition motion correction (PACE) or respiratory triggering.
Ten volunteers and 10 patients underwent each four different high-resolution fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted sequences with 5 mm slice thickness and a full 320 matrix: a multi-breath-hold FSE sequence with and without iPAT and PACE and a respiratory-triggered FSE sequence with and without iPAT. Image quality was rated with a five-point scale by two independent readers. Signal intensity measurements were performed on a water phantom.
The sequences with iPAT required a substantially shorter acquisition time without loss of image quality. Overall image quality was rated equal for all sequences by both readers. Image time for nine slices with iPAT was 13 seconds (19 seconds without iPAT) with multi-breath-hold and on average 4:00 minutes (7:02 minutes without iPAT) with respiratory triggering. Imaging with the PACE technique resulted in more correct positioning of the image stacks.
T2-weighted fast imaging with iPAT is feasible and results in high-quality images within a short acquisition time. Overall image quality is not negatively affected by iPAT.
比较使用屏气序列结合前瞻性采集运动校正(PACE)或呼吸触发的肝脏高分辨率T2加权图像,有无集成并行采集技术(iPAT)。
10名志愿者和10名患者分别接受了四种不同的高分辨率快速自旋回波(FSE)T2加权序列,层厚5mm,矩阵全为320:一种多屏气FSE序列,有无iPAT和PACE;一种呼吸触发FSE序列,有无iPAT。由两名独立的阅片者用五点量表对图像质量进行评分。在水模上进行信号强度测量。
采用iPAT的序列所需采集时间显著缩短,且不损失图像质量。两位阅片者对所有序列的总体图像质量评分相同。采用多屏气时,使用iPAT的九层图像采集时间为13秒(不使用iPAT为19秒),采用呼吸触发时平均为4:00分钟(不使用iPAT为7:02分钟)。使用PACE技术成像可使图像堆栈定位更准确。
采用iPAT的T2加权快速成像可行,且能在短采集时间内获得高质量图像。iPAT对总体图像质量无负面影响。