Derlet R W, Kinser D, Ray L, Hamilton B, McKenzie J
Emergency Department, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Feb;25(2):215-23. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70327-6.
To determine whether nonemergency patients can be prospectively identified by triage nurses and safely triaged out of the emergency department without treatment.
All adult patients (16 years or older) who presented to a university ED were provided an evaluation by a triage nurse. For a patient's case to be defined as nonemergency, four criteria were required: vital signs within a specific range, presence of 1 of 50 potentially nonemergent chief complaints, absence of key indicators found on screening examination, and absence of chest pain, abdominal pain, any severe pain, and inability to walk. Between July 1988 and July 1993, patients who satisfied these criteria were defined as nonemergency, refused care in the ED, and triaged out of the ED. Patients were referred to off-site clinics. The clinics had agreed to see patients in advance of the study, and the referral lists were frequently updated. Outcome data were obtained by telephone surveys to both triaged individuals and other health care providers.
In this 5-year study, 176,074 adults presented to the ambulatory triage area in the ED, and 31,165 (18%) were defined as nonemergency, were not treated, and were referred elsewhere. Letters and telephone calls to all referral clinics, eight local EDs, and the coroner's office identified no instances of gross mistriage and only a small number of insignificant adverse outcomes. Telephone follow-up to individuals triaged away was successful in 34% of calls and showed that 39% of persons received care elsewhere on the same day, 35% received care within 3 days, and 26% decided not to seek medical care. A group of 1.0% sought care at other hospital EDs for minor complaints.
A subset of patients with nonemergency problems can be prospectively identified and triaged out of the ED without significant adverse outcomes provided there is community support for follow-up care.
确定分诊护士能否前瞻性地识别非急诊患者,并将其安全分诊出急诊科而不进行治疗。
所有到大学急诊科就诊的成年患者(16岁及以上)均由分诊护士进行评估。若患者病例被定义为非急诊,需满足四个标准:生命体征在特定范围内、存在50种潜在非急诊主要症状中的一种、筛查检查未发现关键指标,且无胸痛、腹痛、任何剧痛以及无法行走。在1988年7月至1993年7月期间,满足这些标准的患者被定义为非急诊患者,拒绝在急诊科接受治疗,并被分诊出急诊科。患者被转介到外部诊所。这些诊所已同意在研究前接待患者,且转诊名单会经常更新。通过对分诊患者和其他医疗服务提供者进行电话调查来获取结果数据。
在这项为期5年的研究中,176,074名成年人到急诊科的门诊分诊区就诊,其中31,165名(18%)被定义为非急诊患者,未接受治疗并被转介到其他地方。对所有转诊诊所、八家当地急诊科和验尸官办公室进行信件和电话调查,未发现严重分诊错误的情况,仅有少数轻微不良后果。对分诊离开的患者进行电话随访,34%的电话随访成功,结果显示39%的人在同一天在其他地方接受了治疗,35%的人在3天内接受了治疗,26%的人决定不寻求医疗护理。1.0%的人因轻微不适在其他医院急诊科就诊。
只要有社区后续护理的支持,一部分非急诊问题患者可以被前瞻性地识别并分诊出急诊科,且不会产生重大不良后果。