Ingall Timothy John, O'Fallon William Michael, Asplund Kjell, Goldfrank Lewis Robert, Hertzberg Vicki S, Louis Thomas Arthur, Christianson Teresa J Hengy
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
Stroke. 2004 Oct;35(10):2418-24. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000140891.70547.56. Epub 2004 Sep 2.
Following publication of concerns about the results of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) in acute stroke treatment trial, NINDS commissioned an independent committee "to address whether there is concern that eligible stroke patients may not benefit from t-PA given according to the protocol used in the trials and, whether the subgroup imbalance (in baseline stroke severity) invalidates the entire trial."
The original NINDS trial data were reanalyzed to assess the t-PA treatment effect, the effect of the baseline imbalance in stroke severity between the treatment groups on the t-PA treatment effect, and whether subgroups of patients did not benefit from receiving t-PA.
A clinically important and statistically significant benefit of t-PA therapy was identified despite subgroup imbalances in baseline stroke severity and an increased incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in t-PA treated patients. The adjusted t-PA to placebo odds ratio (OR) of a favorable outcome was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.5 to 2.9). Although these exploratory analyses found no statistical evidence that the t-PA treatment effect differed among patient subgroups, the study was not powered to detect subgroup treatment differences.
These findings support the use of t-PA to treat patients with acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours of onset under the NINDS t-PA trial protocol. Health professionals should work collaboratively to develop guidelines to ensure appropriate use of t-PA in acute ischemic stroke patients.
在有关美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所(NINDS)静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(t-PA)治疗急性中风试验结果的担忧发表之后,NINDS委托一个独立委员会“探讨是否存在这样的担忧,即符合条件的中风患者可能无法从按照试验中所使用的方案给予的t-PA治疗中获益,以及基线中风严重程度方面的亚组失衡是否会使整个试验无效”。
对NINDS原始试验数据进行重新分析,以评估t-PA的治疗效果、治疗组之间基线中风严重程度失衡对t-PA治疗效果的影响,以及患者亚组是否无法从接受t-PA治疗中获益。
尽管基线中风严重程度存在亚组失衡,且接受t-PA治疗的患者有症状性脑出血的发生率增加,但仍确定了t-PA治疗具有临床重要且具有统计学意义的益处。调整后的t-PA与安慰剂相比获得良好结局的优势比(OR)为2.1(95%可信区间,1.5至2.9)。虽然这些探索性分析未发现统计学证据表明t-PA治疗效果在患者亚组之间存在差异,但该研究没有足够的检验效能来检测亚组治疗差异。
这些发现支持在NINDS t-PA试验方案下,在发病3小时内使用t-PA治疗急性缺血性中风患者。卫生专业人员应共同努力制定指南,以确保在急性缺血性中风患者中适当使用t-PA。