Bozeman Caleb, Carver Brett, Zabari Gazi, Caldito Gloria, Venable Dennis
Department of Urology, Louisiana State University-Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA.
J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):305-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000092683.35028.03.
We reviewed the management and outcomes of patients at our Level I trauma center suffering major blunt renal trauma diagnosed and staged by CT scan.
We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 26 patients with blunt trauma at our institution who were initially hemodynamically stable and diagnosed with grade 4 or 5 renal injuries by CT scan. Patients were broken down into two groups based on whether they were managed conservatively or surgically. Patient characteristics and morbidity were analyzed.
There were 14 patients managed conservatively and 12 patients managed surgically. There was no statistically significant difference in morbidity between the two groups. The only statistically significant predictor of failure of conservative management was a coexisting solid organ intra-abdominal injury.
Conservative management of major blunt renal trauma is appropriate in hemodynamically stable patients.
我们回顾了在我们一级创伤中心,经CT扫描诊断并分期的严重钝性肾损伤患者的治疗及预后情况。
我们回顾性分析了本院26例钝性创伤患者的病例,这些患者最初血流动力学稳定,经CT扫描诊断为4级或5级肾损伤。根据患者接受的是保守治疗还是手术治疗,将其分为两组。分析患者特征及发病率。
14例患者接受保守治疗,12例患者接受手术治疗。两组发病率无统计学显著差异。保守治疗失败的唯一具有统计学显著意义的预测因素是并存的腹腔实性脏器损伤。
对于血流动力学稳定的严重钝性肾损伤患者,保守治疗是合适的。