Nettis E, Colanardi M C, Paradiso M T, Ferrannini A
Department of Medical Clinic, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Sep;34(9):1401-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02019.x.
Chronic urticaria (CU) is a common skin condition. It is frequently a disabling disease due to the persistency of clinical symptoms, the unpredictable course and negative influence on the quality of life.
The aim of this study is to determine whether montelukast, a LTD4 receptor antagonist, plus desloratadine, is more efficacious than desloratadine alone in the treatment of chronic urticaria.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted on 81 patients with a diagnosis of CU. A 1-week single-blind placebo run-in period (baseline) was followed by a 6-weeks double blind active treatment period. The patients were randomized to receive the following treatment once daily: (a) oral desloratadine (5 mg) plus placebo; (b) desloratadine (5 mg) plus montelukast (10 mg); (c) oral placebo alone. The study ended after another 1-week single-blind placebo washout period.
The evaluable population thus consisted of 76 patients. Both desloratadine alone and desloratadine plus montelukast administered once daily yielded improvements with respect to the baseline assessment as regards pruritus, number of separate episodes, size and number of weals, visual analogue score and patients' quality of life and with respect to the placebo group both in the active treatment period and in the run-out period. However, desloratadine plus montelukast was shown to improve the symptoms and patients' quality of life significantly more than desloratadine alone, although it did not have a significant effect on the number of urticarial episodes.
The combination of desloratadine plus montelukast is effective in the treatment of CU. It may therefore be a valid alternative in patients with relatively mild CU, in view of its efficacy and the lack of adverse events.
慢性荨麻疹(CU)是一种常见的皮肤疾病。由于临床症状持续存在、病程不可预测且对生活质量有负面影响,它常常是一种致残性疾病。
本研究的目的是确定白三烯D4(LTD4)受体拮抗剂孟鲁司特联合地氯雷他定在治疗慢性荨麻疹方面是否比单独使用地氯雷他定更有效。
对81例诊断为CU的患者进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。在为期1周的单盲安慰剂导入期(基线期)之后,进行为期6周的双盲活性治疗期。患者被随机分组,每天接受以下治疗一次:(a)口服地氯雷他定(5毫克)加安慰剂;(b)地氯雷他定(5毫克)加孟鲁司特(10毫克);(c)单独口服安慰剂。在又一个为期1周的单盲安慰剂洗脱期后,研究结束。
可评估人群包括76例患者。单独使用地氯雷他定以及每天一次给予地氯雷他定加孟鲁司特,在瘙痒、发作次数、风团大小和数量、视觉模拟评分以及患者生活质量方面,与基线评估相比均有改善,并且在活性治疗期和洗脱期与安慰剂组相比也有改善。然而,尽管地氯雷他定加孟鲁司特对荨麻疹发作次数没有显著影响,但它在改善症状和患者生活质量方面比单独使用地氯雷他定显著更有效。
地氯雷他定加孟鲁司特联合用药在治疗CU方面有效。鉴于其疗效和无不良事件,它可能是相对轻度CU患者的一种有效替代方案。