Suppr超能文献

挪威养老院中受到约束的患者患病率。

Prevalence of patients subjected to constraint in Norwegian nursing homes.

作者信息

Kirkevold Øyvind, Engedal Knut

机构信息

Norwegian Centre for Dementia Research, Vestfold Mental Health Care Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Sep;18(3):281-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00278.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A recent questionnaire showed that different kinds of constraint such as physical restraint, electronic surveillance, use of force or pressure in medical treatment and in activities of daily living (ADL) are frequently used in Norwegian nursing homes. The study did not include information at patient level, and except for studies about physical restraints, we have not found any studies reporting the prevalence of various forms of constraint.

AIM

To describe the prevalence of various types of constraint in Norwegian nursing homes.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A structured interview was carried out with the primary carers of a random sample of 1501 patients from 222 nursing-home wards in 54 municipalities representing all five health regions in Norway. Data were collected from regular units (RUs) and special care units (SCUs) for persons with dementia. Episodes of constraint during 1 week were recorded. Five main groups of constraint were aggregated, mechanical restraint, nonmechanical restraint, electronic surveillance, force or pressure in medical examination or treatment and force or pressure in ADL.

RESULTS

Patients (36.7%) in RUs and 45.0% of the patients in SCUs were subjected to any constraint. Most frequent was use of mechanical restraint (23.3% in RUs; 12.8% in SCUs) and use of force or pressure in ADL (20.9% in SCUs; 16.6% in RUs). Use of force or pressure in medical examination or treatment was more frequent used in SCUs (19.1%) compared with RUs (13.5%). Nonmechanical restraint was less frequently used (8.3% in SCUs; 3.0% in RUs) and electronic surveillance was seldom used (7.2% in RUs; 0.9% in SCUs).

CONCLUSION

The use of constraint is a problem in Norwegian nursing homes. Studies are needed to learn more about why constraint is used, and if there is patient or ward characteristics that can explain the use of constraint.

摘要

背景

最近的一项问卷调查显示,挪威养老院经常使用不同类型的约束措施,如身体约束、电子监控、在医疗和日常生活活动(ADL)中使用武力或压力。该研究未包含患者层面的信息,除了关于身体约束的研究外,我们尚未发现任何报告各种形式约束措施发生率的研究。

目的

描述挪威养老院中各种类型约束措施的发生率。

材料与方法

对来自挪威五个健康区域54个市222个养老院病房的1501名患者的主要护理人员进行了结构化访谈。数据收集自痴呆症患者的常规病房(RUs)和特殊护理病房(SCUs)。记录了1周内的约束事件。汇总了五类主要的约束措施:机械约束、非机械约束、电子监控、医疗检查或治疗中使用武力或压力以及ADL中使用武力或压力。

结果

常规病房中36.7%的患者和特殊护理病房中45.0%的患者受到了任何约束。最常使用的是机械约束(常规病房中为23.3%;特殊护理病房中为12.8%)以及ADL中使用武力或压力(特殊护理病房中为20.9%;常规病房中为16.6%)。与常规病房(13.5%)相比,特殊护理病房中在医疗检查或治疗中使用武力或压力更为频繁(19.1%)。非机械约束使用较少(特殊护理病房中为8.3%;常规病房中为3.0%),电子监控很少使用(常规病房中为7.2%;特殊护理病房中为0.9%)。

结论

在挪威养老院中,约束措施的使用是一个问题。需要开展研究以进一步了解使用约束措施的原因,以及是否存在能够解释约束措施使用情况的患者或病房特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验