McKinlay Rodrick D, Park Adrian
Department of Surgery, University of Maryland College of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, USA.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;8(6):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.11.006.
Conventional repair of recurrent ventral incisional hernia is associated with a higher recurrence rate (30%-50%) than repair of primary incisional hernia (11%-20%). Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) can significantly reduce the recurrence rate of primary hernia to less than 5%. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of repairing recurrent incisional hernia laparoscopically. One-hundred and seventy consecutive patients undergoing LIHR between January 1995 and December 2002 were prospectively reviewed. Patients with recurrent incisional hernia (n=69) were compared to patients with primary incisional hernia (n=101). Patient demographics and perioperative and postoperative data were recorded prospectively. Follow-up was obtained from office visits and telephone interviews. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and the chi(2) test. Results are expressed as means +/- standard deviation. The patients with recurrent incisional hernia had a mean of 1.9 +/- 1.3 previous repairs, higher body mass index (BMI) (34 +/- 6 kg/m(2) vs. 33 +/- 8 kg/m(2), P=0.46), larger defect size (123 +/- 115 cm(2) vs. 101 +/- 108 cm(2), P=0.06), and longer operative time (119 +/- 61 minutes vs. 109 +/- 44 minutes, P=0.11). The complication rate was higher in the recurrent group (28% vs. 11%, P=0.01), but the recurrence rate was not different (7% vs. 5%, P=0.53). The mean time to recurrence was significantly shorter in the recurrent group (3 +/- 2 months vs. 14 +/- 7 months, P < 0.0001). The mean follow-up interval was 19 +/- 18 months in the recurrent group and 27 +/- 20 months in the primary group. Although laparoscopic repair of recurrent incisional hernia resulted in a higher recurrence and complication rate than laparoscopic repair of primary incisional hernia, the rates were lower than those reported for conventional repair of recurrent incisional hernia. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent incisional hernia is an effective alternative to conventional repair.
与原发性切口疝修补术(复发率11%-20%)相比,复发性腹侧切口疝的传统修补术复发率更高(30%-50%)。腹腔镜切口疝修补术(LIHR)可将原发性疝的复发率显著降低至5%以下。在本研究中,我们评估了腹腔镜修复复发性切口疝的疗效。对1995年1月至2002年12月期间连续接受LIHR的170例患者进行了前瞻性回顾。将复发性切口疝患者(n=69)与原发性切口疝患者(n=101)进行比较。前瞻性记录患者的人口统计学资料以及围手术期和术后数据。通过门诊就诊和电话访谈进行随访。使用学生t检验和卡方检验进行统计分析。结果以均值±标准差表示。复发性切口疝患者既往平均修补次数为1.9±1.3次,体重指数(BMI)更高(34±6kg/m²对33±8kg/m²,P=0.46),缺损尺寸更大(123±115cm²对101±108cm²,P=0.06),手术时间更长(119±61分钟对109±44分钟,P=0.11)。复发组并发症发生率更高(28%对11%,P=0.01),但复发率无差异(7%对5%,P=0.53)。复发组复发的平均时间显著更短(3±2个月对14±7个月,P<0.0(此处原文有误,应为P<0.0001))。复发组平均随访间隔为19±18个月,原发性组为27±20个月。尽管腹腔镜修复复发性切口疝的复发率和并发症发生率高于腹腔镜修复原发性切口疝,但低于复发性切口疝传统修补术的报道发生率。腹腔镜修复复发性切口疝是传统修补术的一种有效替代方法。