• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对体重指数(BMI)超过35的病态肥胖患者进行腹腔镜下切口疝和原发性腹疝治疗。

Laparoscopic treatment of incisional and primary ventral hernia in morbidly obese patients with a BMI over 35.

作者信息

Marx L, Raharimanantsoa M, Mandala S, D'Urso A, Vix M, Mutter D

机构信息

Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, IRCAD/EITS, IHU Strasbourg, NHC - Pôle Hépato-Digestif, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3310-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3607-6. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3607-6
PMID:25007972
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Incisional and ventral hernias are common surgical indications. Their management is associated with significant complications and recurrences in open surgery (15-25%). Since laparoscopy has become a standard in bariatric surgery, there has been a natural trend to treat obese patients with parietal wall defects laparoscopically. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and the results of the laparoscopic management of parietal wall defects in patients with a BMI >35.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 79 patients were included. Data were acquired prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The surgical procedure was standardized: 3 ports, mesh type (Parietex™ Composite mesh, Covidien, France), fixation with non-absorbable transfascial sutures, and tackers. Complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of 79 patients (29 men, 50 women), 43 had umbilical and 36 had ventral hernias. Mean age was 52.4 years, and mean BMI was 40.83 kg/m(2). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 2 days. Postoperative pain evaluated by visual analog scale was 2.86. No intraoperative complications or deaths occurred. Seven postoperative complications occurred (8.86%): two parietal wall hematomas treated by radiological embolization, two significant cases of postoperative pain, one postoperative obstruction, one spontaneously resolved respiratory failure, and one early (day 1) parietal wall defect with immediate reoperation. Postoperative seroma rate was 26.58% (21 patients, all of whom were treated conservatively). Postoperative follow-up was 18.10 months (1-84 months), and recurrence rate was 3.8% (3 patients).

DISCUSSION

This study confirms the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach for ventral hernias in morbidly obese patients. Recurrence rates (3.8%) appeared lower than the ones observed in the literature (15-25%). Postoperative hemorrhage and port-site hernia are specific complications of this approach. Postoperative hospital stay is low (2 days) as compared to open surgery. Laparoscopic management of parietal wall defects should be considered a standard option in morbidly obese patients.

摘要

引言

切口疝和腹疝是常见的手术适应症。其治疗在开放手术中会伴有显著的并发症和复发率(15%-25%)。自从腹腔镜手术成为减重手术的标准术式以来,对于肥胖且伴有腹壁缺损的患者,采用腹腔镜治疗便成为一种自然趋势。我们研究的目的是评估体重指数(BMI)>35的患者采用腹腔镜治疗腹壁缺损的可行性及效果。

材料与方法

纳入79例患者。前瞻性收集数据并进行回顾性分析。手术操作标准化:采用3个穿刺孔、Parietex™复合补片(法国科惠医疗公司)、用不可吸收的经筋膜缝线及钉合器固定。对并发症进行评估。

结果

79例患者(29例男性,50例女性)中,43例为脐疝,36例为腹疝。平均年龄52.4岁,平均BMI为40.83kg/m²。术后平均住院时间为2天。采用视觉模拟评分法评估的术后疼痛评分为2.86。术中无并发症及死亡发生。发生7例术后并发症(8.86%):2例腹壁血肿经放射栓塞治疗,2例严重术后疼痛,1例术后肠梗阻,1例自发缓解的呼吸衰竭,1例早期(第1天)腹壁缺损并立即再次手术。术后血清肿发生率为26.58%(21例患者,均采用保守治疗)。术后随访18.10个月(1-84个月),复发率为3.8%(3例患者)。

讨论

本研究证实了腹腔镜治疗病态肥胖患者腹疝的可行性和安全性。复发率(3.8%)似乎低于文献报道(15%-25%)。术后出血和穿刺孔疝是该手术方式的特定并发症。与开放手术相比,术后住院时间较短(2天)。对于病态肥胖患者,腹腔镜治疗腹壁缺损应被视为一种标准选择。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic treatment of incisional and primary ventral hernia in morbidly obese patients with a BMI over 35.对体重指数(BMI)超过35的病态肥胖患者进行腹腔镜下切口疝和原发性腹疝治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3310-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3607-6. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
3
Massive Incisional Hernia Repair with Parietex: Monocentric Analysis on 500 Cases Treated with a Laparoscopic Approach.使用 Parietex 进行巨大切口疝修补术:腹腔镜手术治疗 500 例的单中心分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):388-392. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0623. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
Long-term clinical experience with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a ParietexTM composite mesh in severely obese and non-severe obese patients: a single center cohort study.使用ParietexTM复合补片对重度肥胖和非重度肥胖患者进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术的长期临床经验:一项单中心队列研究
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019 Oct;28(5):304-308. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1521431. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience.1326例采用常规缝合理念的腹腔镜切口疝和腹疝修补术的长期疗效:单中心经验
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
6
Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with "double crown" versus "sutures and tackers" in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.随机临床试验:网片固定采用“双帽”与“缝线和钉枪”在腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术中的比较。
Hernia. 2013 Oct;17(5):603-12. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1084-9. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
7
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.
8
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a report of 100 consecutive cases.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:100例连续病例报告。
Surg Endosc. 2000 May;14(5):419-23. doi: 10.1007/s004640000179.
10
Laparoscopic treatment for ventral hernia in obese patients.肥胖患者腹疝的腹腔镜治疗
Ann Ital Chir. 2022;93:689-697.

引用本文的文献

1
Are laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs truly comparable?: A propensity-matched study in large ventral hernias.腹腔镜与开放腹侧疝修补术真的可比吗?:大腹侧疝的倾向匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4653-4660. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07894-w. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal onlay mesh-results from a general surgical unit.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术加腹腔内补片-普通外科单元的结果。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1357-1362. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02012-9. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
3
Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair and Endoscopic Component Separation: Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: is there an optimal mesh fixation technique? A systematic review.腹腔镜腹疝修补术:是否存在最佳的补片固定技术?一项系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1126-x.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜下腹膜疝修补术。
Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;93(5):1091-110. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
3
Postoperative surgical site infections after ventral/incisional hernia repair: a comparison of open and laparoscopic outcomes.
机器人辅助腹疝修补术与内镜下组织分离术:结果
JSLS. 2017 Jul-Sep;21(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00055.
4
Risk-adjusted procedure tailoring leads to uniformly low complication rates in ventral and incisional hernia repair: a propensity score analysis and internal validation of classification criteria.风险调整后的手术定制可使腹疝和切口疝修补术的并发症发生率均保持在较低水平:一项倾向评分分析及分类标准的内部验证
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):569-582. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1622-y. Epub 2017 May 31.
5
The Impact of Body Mass Index on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: A Comparative Study.体重指数对腹壁重建结果的影响:一项比较研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1234-1244. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003264.
6
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
What is the BMI threshold for open ventral hernia repair?开放性腹疝修补术的体重指数阈值是多少?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1311-1317. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5113-5. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
腹侧/切口疝修补术后手术部位感染:开放式与腹腔镜手术结果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2221-30. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2743-0. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
4
Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is the preferred approach in obese patients.腹腔镜脐疝修补术是肥胖患者的首选方法。
Am J Surg. 2013 Feb;205(2):231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
5
Prospective, long-term comparison of quality of life in laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放式腹侧疝修补术的前瞻性长期生活质量比较。
Ann Surg. 2012 Nov;256(5):714-22; discussion 722-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182734130.
6
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in the elderly: does the type of hernia matter?老年人腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术:疝的类型重要吗?
Hernia. 2012 Aug;16(4):425-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0932-3. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
7
Comparison of early outcomes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair between nonobese and morbidly obese patient populations.非肥胖和病态肥胖患者群体腹腔镜腹疝修补术早期结果的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2244-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0039-1. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
8
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) in morbidly obese patients.肥胖症患者的腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术(LVHR)
Hernia. 2008 Jun;12(3):233-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0310-8. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
9
Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的汇总数据分析:14年患者数据积累
Surg Endosc. 2007 Mar;21(3):378-86. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9115-6. Epub 2006 Dec 16.
10
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a new standard of care.肥胖患者的腹腔镜腹疝修补术:一种新的护理标准。
Arch Surg. 2006 Jan;141(1):57-61. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.1.57.