• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过肺癌专科护士单独写信,在告知坏消息的会诊后,向全科医生传达更多社会和心理信息。

Increasing social and psychological information conveyed to General Practitioners after bad news consultations by use of separate letters from the Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist.

作者信息

Jaafar F, Davison A G, Beaty T, Eraut C D, Haque A S, Lamont A, Trask C W

机构信息

Southend Associate University Hospital, Southend on Sea, Essex SSO ORY, UK.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2004 Oct;46(1):57-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.03.014.

DOI:10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.03.014
PMID:15364133
Abstract

Multidisciplinary teams (MDT) now review all cases of lung cancer. These teams include a Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist (LCNS). These Nurses help support the patient and should facilitate communication and liaise with other services. The LCNS is present when the diagnosis is given to the patient but also usually spends time afterwards with the patient and their family. We postulated that a separate letter from the LCNS to the General Practitioner (GP) after the consultations would convey extra information to the GP. In 58 new lung cancer patients reviewed in the clinic, the LCNS and Physician independently wrote separate letters after the consultation in which the diagnosis of lung cancer was given. The GPs were asked by questionnaire about the usefulness of the letter from the LCNS. This letter was considered by the GP to provide extra information in: (i) 69% concerning the patients reaction to the diagnosis; (ii) 85% concerning who attended the clinic with the patient; (iii) 85% about what referrals were made to community services; (iv) 86% about who the patient was living with; (v) 81% about who the patients carers were; (vi) 81% information on the patients condition; (vii) 70% concerning the information given to patients about benefits. Ninety-seven percent of the GPs found the LCNS letter useful or very useful and 92% of the GPs thought that the information in the letter would be useful or very useful when they next saw the patient. Separate and independent letters from the LCNS after "bad news" consultation in lung cancer provides added useful information for GPs. Ninety-one percent of the GPs wanted the letters from the LCNS to continue.

摘要

多学科团队(MDT)现在会对所有肺癌病例进行评估。这些团队包括肺癌专科护士(LCNS)。这些护士为患者提供支持,并应促进沟通以及与其他服务部门进行联络。当向患者告知诊断结果时,肺癌专科护士会在场,而且通常在之后还会花时间陪伴患者及其家人。我们推测,会诊后由肺癌专科护士单独给全科医生(GP)写一封信,会向全科医生传达额外信息。在诊所评估的58例新发肺癌患者中,肺癌专科护士和医生在给出肺癌诊断的会诊后分别独立撰写了一封信。通过问卷调查询问全科医生关于肺癌专科护士信件的有用性。全科医生认为这封信在以下方面提供了额外信息:(i)69%涉及患者对诊断的反应;(ii)85%涉及谁陪同患者就诊;(iii)85%涉及向社区服务机构进行了哪些转诊;(iv)86%涉及患者与谁同住;(v)81%涉及患者的护理人员是谁;(vi)81%关于患者病情的信息;(vii)70%涉及向患者提供的关于福利的信息。97%的全科医生认为肺癌专科护士的信有用或非常有用,92%的全科医生认为信中的信息在他们下次见到患者时会有用或非常有用。肺癌“坏消息”会诊后由肺癌专科护士单独撰写的独立信件为全科医生提供了额外的有用信息。91%的全科医生希望继续收到肺癌专科护士的信件。

相似文献

1
Increasing social and psychological information conveyed to General Practitioners after bad news consultations by use of separate letters from the Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist.通过肺癌专科护士单独写信,在告知坏消息的会诊后,向全科医生传达更多社会和心理信息。
Lung Cancer. 2004 Oct;46(1):57-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.03.014.
2
How useful are post consultation letters to patients?会诊后写给患者的信件有多大用处?
BMC Med. 2006 Jan 20;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-2.
3
The specialist palliative care nurse: a qualitative study of the patients' perspective.专科姑息治疗护士:一项关于患者观点的定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Nov;43(8):1011-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.007. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
4
Prospective assessment of patient directed outpatient communication from a patient and general practitioner perspective.患者和全科医生视角下的患者导向门诊沟通的前瞻性评估。
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Aug;85(1006):395-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.068601.
5
Lung cancer: an exploration of patient and general practitioner perspectives on the realities of care in rural Western Australia.肺癌:西澳大利亚农村地区患者及全科医生对医疗现状的观点探究
Aust J Rural Health. 2008 Dec;16(6):355-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.01016.x.
6
Referral letters to colorectal surgeons: the impact of peer-mediated feedback.给结直肠外科医生的转诊信:同行介导反馈的影响。
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Feb;54(499):123-6.
7
A study to evaluate nurse-led on-treatment review for patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.一项评估由护士主导的针对头颈癌放疗患者的治疗期间复查的研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(11):1428-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01976.x. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
8
Barriers to effective communication across the primary/secondary interface: examples from the ovarian cancer patient journey (a qualitative study).初级/二级医疗衔接中有效沟通的障碍:来自卵巢癌患者就医过程的实例(一项定性研究)
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2005 Sep;14(4):359-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00596.x.
9
Perceptions and practice of concordance in nurses' prescribing consultations: findings from a national questionnaire survey and case studies of practice in England.护士处方咨询中一致性的认知与实践:来自英国全国问卷调查及实践案例研究的结果
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jan;44(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.005. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
10
[Improvement in the internists' outpatient report using a time control system and systematic feedback by the general practitioner].[通过时间控制系统和全科医生的系统反馈改善内科医生的门诊报告]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 Feb 17;140(7):361-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychologists' views of inter-disciplinary psychosocial communication within the cancer care team.心理学家对癌症护理团队中跨学科心理社会沟通的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Dec;22(12):3193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2299-8. Epub 2014 Jun 28.