• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理学家对癌症护理团队中跨学科心理社会沟通的看法。

Psychologists' views of inter-disciplinary psychosocial communication within the cancer care team.

机构信息

Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2014 Dec;22(12):3193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2299-8. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-014-2299-8
PMID:24972585
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how psychologists working in cancer care centres communicate clinical information to other members of the multidisciplinary team or what information is communicated.

PURPOSE

This study surveyed Australian cancer care psychologists regarding their communication practices and their views on barriers to and facilitators of effective inter-disciplinary communication.

METHODS

Psychologists were invited to complete an online survey containing purpose-designed items that addressed study aims.

RESULTS

Forty-four psychologists completed the survey. Psychologists' most common method of recording initial consultations was in patient medical records, with 69 % of respondents recording notes in either most of the time or all of the time. Twenty-two percent of psychologists said they did not regularly feedback the results of an initial assessment to a referrer and more than 40 % used verbal and e-mail communication to do so.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides data that will assist in the development of guidelines for inter-professional communication between psychologists and other members of the cancer care team.

摘要

背景

对于在癌症治疗中心工作的心理学家如何与多学科团队的其他成员交流临床信息,以及交流哪些信息,人们知之甚少。

目的

本研究调查了澳大利亚癌症治疗心理学家的沟通实践情况,以及他们对跨学科有效沟通的障碍和促进因素的看法。

方法

心理学家被邀请完成一份在线调查,其中包含了针对研究目的设计的项目。

结果

44 名心理学家完成了调查。心理学家记录初始咨询的最常见方法是在患者的医疗记录中,69%的受访者表示他们经常或全部记录笔记。22%的心理学家表示他们不会定期向转介者反馈初始评估的结果,超过 40%的心理学家通过口头和电子邮件进行沟通。

结论

本研究提供的数据将有助于制定心理学家与癌症治疗团队其他成员之间的专业沟通指南。

相似文献

1
Psychologists' views of inter-disciplinary psychosocial communication within the cancer care team.心理学家对癌症护理团队中跨学科心理社会沟通的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Dec;22(12):3193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2299-8. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
2
[A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union].[关于法国及欧盟心理学家培训改革的一项提议]
Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.11.008. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
3
Clinical psychologists' experiences of reflective staff groups in inpatient psychiatric settings: a mixed methods study.临床心理学家在住院精神科环境中参与反思性员工小组的经历:一项混合方法研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):324-40. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1834. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
4
'Chipping in': clinical psychologists' descriptions of their use of formulation in multidisciplinary team working.“共同参与”:临床心理学家对其在多学科团队工作中应用心理定式的描述。
Psychol Psychother. 2012 Dec;85(4):424-35. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02041.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
5
Collaboration Between GPs and Psychologists: Dissatisfaction from the Psychologists' Perspective-A Cross-Sectional Study.全科医生与心理学家的合作:心理学家视角下的不满——一项横断面研究。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2020 Jun;27(2):331-342. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09663-x.
6
A qualitative investigation of Australian psychologists' perceptions about complementary and alternative medicine for use in clinical practice.澳大利亚心理学家对在临床实践中使用补充和替代医学的看法的定性研究。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;29:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
An exploration of Australian psychologists' role in assessing women considering risk-reducing or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.对澳大利亚心理学家在评估考虑进行降低风险或对侧预防性乳房切除术的女性时所扮演角色的探索。
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Educational Value of Surgical Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Learning Non-Technical Skills - A Pilot Survey of Trainees From Two UK Deaneries.外科多学科团队会议对于学习非技术技能的教育价值——来自两个英国教务长区学员的试点调查。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):1034-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
9
Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study.提高泌尿外科癌症护理多学科团队会议效率和效用的策略:一项调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 8;14:377. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-377.
10
Care in movement: Health psychology in the Sofia Feldman Maternity Hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.运动中的关怀:巴西贝洛奥里藏特索菲亚·费尔德曼妇产医院的健康心理学
J Health Psychol. 2016 Mar;21(3):324-35. doi: 10.1177/1359105316636498.

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative study of consumer attitudes to sharing psychosocial information within the multidisciplinary cancer care team.一项关于消费者对在多学科癌症护理团队中分享心理社会信息的态度的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Apr;22(4):869-70. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2115-x. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
2
ABC conceptual model of effective multidisciplinary cancer care.ABC 癌症综合治疗有效模式概念模型。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep;7(9):544-7. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.115. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
3
The origins of multidisciplinary cancer care.多学科癌症护理的起源。
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Sep;110(3 Suppl 2):S2-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.035.
4
Increasing social and psychological information conveyed to General Practitioners after bad news consultations by use of separate letters from the Lung Cancer Nurse Specialist.通过肺癌专科护士单独写信,在告知坏消息的会诊后,向全科医生传达更多社会和心理信息。
Lung Cancer. 2004 Oct;46(1):57-9. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.03.014.
5
Oncologists and family physicians. Using a standardized letter to improve communication.肿瘤学家和家庭医生。使用标准化信函改善沟通。
Can Fam Physician. 2003 Jul;49:882-6.
6
Improving doctors' letters.改进医生的信件。
Med J Aust. 2002 Nov 4;177(9):516-20. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04926.x.
7
The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience.多学科乳腺癌中心对患者管理建议的影响:宾夕法尼亚大学的经验
Cancer. 2001 Apr 1;91(7):1231-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010401)91:7<1231::aid-cncr1123>3.0.co;2-k.
8
Communication between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists regarding patients with cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy.关于接受姑息性放疗的癌症患者,初级保健医生与放射肿瘤学家之间的沟通。
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(15):2902-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.15.2902.
9
Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care.提升我们书写的信件质量:癌症护理中医生间沟通的探索
Br J Cancer. 1999 May;80(3-4):427-37. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690374.
10
Written communication from specialists to general practitioners in cancer care. What are the expectations and how are they met?癌症护理领域专家与全科医生之间的书面沟通。期望是什么,又是如何实现的?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1998 Sep;16(3):154-9. doi: 10.1080/028134398750003106.