Farquhar M C, Barclay S I G, Earl H, Grande G E, Emery J, Crawford R A F
Department of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2005 Sep;14(4):359-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00596.x.
Effective communication across the primary/secondary interface is vital for the planning and delivery of appropriate patient care throughout the cancer patient journey. This study describes GPs' views of the communication issues across the primary/secondary interface in relation to ovarian cancer patients using qualitative interviews with purposively sampled general practitioners (GPs) and an audit of hospital medical records of 30 deceased ovarian cancer patients. Issues raised by the GPs related to the content and format of communications, but of most concern was the tardiness. The time lag between dictation and typing letters ranged from 0 to 27 days, with a delay of up to 8 days for signing before transit through various mail systems to the GP. Three stages in the patient journey were characterized by particular issues: (1) in the pre-diagnostic and diagnostic stage was a need for prompt information regarding the results of tests and diagnoses, and clearer guidance on the use of tests and fast-track referrals; (2) in the active treatment phase, when GPs could lose touch with their patients, they needed effective communication in order to provide moral support and crisis management; and (3) when oncology withdrew and the focus of care switched back to the community for the terminal phase, GPs needed information to enable them to pick up the baton of care. There is a need to develop and evaluate interventions aimed at improving the content and speed of communications between secondary and primary care. Such interventions are likely to be complex and might include the greater use of telephone or fax for more selected communications, a review of secretarial support, the use of email, the development of GP designed proformas, the feasibility of patient/carer letter delivery options, nurse-led communication, universal electronic patient records, or a revisiting of the patient-held record.
在癌症患者的整个治疗过程中,初级/二级医疗界面之间的有效沟通对于规划和提供适当的患者护理至关重要。本研究通过对有目的抽样的全科医生(GP)进行定性访谈以及对30例已故卵巢癌患者的医院病历进行审核,描述了全科医生对与卵巢癌患者相关的初级/二级医疗界面沟通问题的看法。全科医生提出的问题涉及沟通的内容和形式,但最令人担忧的是延迟问题。听写和打印信件之间的时间间隔为0至27天,在通过各种邮件系统转交给全科医生之前,签字延迟长达8天。患者治疗过程中的三个阶段存在特定问题:(1)在诊断前和诊断阶段,需要及时提供有关检查和诊断结果的信息,以及关于检查使用和快速转诊的更明确指导;(2)在积极治疗阶段,当全科医生可能与患者失去联系时,他们需要有效的沟通以提供精神支持和危机管理;(3)当肿瘤学护理退出且护理重点在终末期转回社区时,全科医生需要信息以便能够接过护理接力棒。有必要开发和评估旨在改善二级和初级医疗之间沟通内容和速度的干预措施。此类干预措施可能很复杂,可能包括更多地使用电话或传真进行更有针对性的沟通、审查秘书支持、使用电子邮件、开发全科医生设计的表格、患者/护理人员信件递送选项的可行性、护士主导的沟通、通用电子患者记录,或重新审视患者持有的记录。