Roviaro Giancarlo, Varoli Federico, Vergani Contardo, Nucca Ombretta, Maciocco Marco, Grignani Fabrizio
University of Milan, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS, Milan, Pad. Zonda, Via Francesco Sforza, 35, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Chest. 2004 Sep;126(3):725-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.725.
The aim of this study was to evaluate our personal experience and survival curves after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomies for stage I lung cancer, in comparison with the results reported in existing literature.
Retrospective analysis of our experience and an overview of literature.
Department of Surgery, San Giuseppe Hospital, University of Milan.
From October 1991 to December 2001, of 257 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer, 193 patients underwent VATS lobectomy, 7 patients were declared inoperable at thoracoscopic exploration, and 57 patients were converted (18 patients for oncologic reasons and 39 patients for technical reasons).
We observed no intraoperative mortality and no recurrence. Survival data were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method along with a log-rank test for statistical significance. The global survival rates at 3 years and 5 years were 77.7% and 63.64%, respectively. T1N0 patients had a better survival curve at 3 years and 5 years (83.50% and 70.21%, respectively) compared to T2N0 patients (71.13% and 56.12%). Patients < 70 years of age had better 3-year and 5-year survival rates (82.37% and 73.32%, respectively) than those > 70 years of age (57.49% and 37.09%). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01).
Our results after the VATS approach match the "best" results reported in literature following conventional surgery. Minimally invasive surgery seems to imply reduced tissue damage and decreased impairment of immunologic function. VATS lobectomy permits radical oncology as accurately as lobectomy by thoracotomy, provided that long-established standards are respected. In spite of technical difficulties, it could therefore become a valid alternative in treating stage I lung cancer.
本研究旨在评估我们在电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术治疗Ⅰ期肺癌后的个人经验和生存曲线,并与现有文献报道的结果进行比较。
对我们的经验进行回顾性分析并综述文献。
米兰大学圣朱塞佩医院外科。
1991年10月至2001年12月,257例临床Ⅰ期肺癌患者中,193例接受了VATS肺叶切除术,7例在胸腔镜探查时被判定无法手术,57例中转开胸(18例因肿瘤原因,39例因技术原因)。
我们观察到无术中死亡及复发情况。采用Kaplan-Meier方法分析生存数据,并进行对数秩检验以确定统计学意义。3年和5年的总生存率分别为77.7%和63.64%。与T2N0患者(71.13%和56.12%)相比,T1N0患者在3年和5年时的生存曲线更好(分别为83.50%和70.21%)。年龄<70岁的患者3年和5年生存率(分别为82.37%和73.32%)高于年龄>70岁的患者(57.49%和37.09%)。这种差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。
我们采用VATS方法的结果与传统手术文献报道的“最佳”结果相符。微创手术似乎意味着组织损伤减少和免疫功能损害降低。只要遵循长期确立的标准,VATS肺叶切除术在肿瘤根治方面与开胸肺叶切除术一样准确。尽管存在技术困难,但它可能成为治疗Ⅰ期肺癌的有效替代方法。