Suppr超能文献

丹麦工作场所噪声暴露监测:一项基线调查。

Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline survey.

作者信息

Kock S, Andersen T, Kolstad H A, Kofoed-Nielsen B, Wiesler F, Bonde J P

机构信息

Department of Occupational Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;61(10):838-43. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.012757.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate an epidemiological approach to a national noise hazard surveillance strategy, and report current exposure levels in the Danish workplace.

METHODS

A study base of 840 companies in 10 selected high risk industries in the largest county in Denmark was identified from a national register. Noise exposure was measured among manual workers recruited from a random sample of workplaces in each industry. For reference, financial companies and a sample of residents were investigated according to the same protocol. The A-weighted equivalent sound level (L(Aeq)) for a full shift was measured by portable dosimeters worn by 830 workers employed at 91 workplaces (67% of 136 eligible companies).

RESULTS

The epidemiological design proved feasible and established a baseline for future noise surveillance. Substantial resources were needed to motivate workplaces to enlist and the final participation rate was less than optimal (66.9%). The L(Aeq (8)) values in the selected industries were highly elevated (mean 83.7 dB(A) (95% CI 83.3 to 84.1) in comparison with residents and office workers (mean 69.9 dB(A), 95% CI 68.8 to 71.0). Some 50% of the workers were exposed to more than 85 dB(A) and some 20% to more than 90 dB(A) in several industries.

CONCLUSION

Noise levels in Danish high risk industries remain high. A substantial proportion of workers are exposed to noise levels above the current threshold limit of 85 dB(A). Ongoing surveillance of noise exposure using full shift dosimetry of workers in random samples of workplaces most at risk to high noise levels may help reinforce preventive measures. Such a programme would benefit from compulsory workplace participation.

摘要

目的

评估一种用于国家噪声危害监测策略的流行病学方法,并报告丹麦工作场所当前的暴露水平。

方法

从国家登记册中确定丹麦最大郡10个选定高风险行业的840家公司作为研究基础。在每个行业从工作场所随机抽取的体力劳动者中测量噪声暴露。作为对照,按照相同方案对金融公司和一部分居民进行了调查。由91个工作场所(占136家符合条件公司的67%)的830名工人佩戴便携式剂量计测量整个班次的A加权等效声级(L(Aeq))。

结果

流行病学设计证明是可行的,并为未来的噪声监测建立了基线。需要大量资源来促使工作场所参与,最终参与率低于最佳水平(66.9%)。所选行业的L(Aeq(8))值大幅升高(平均83.7 dB(A)(95%置信区间83.3至84.1)),相比居民和办公室工作人员(平均69.9 dB(A),95%置信区间68.8至71.0)。在几个行业中,约50%的工人暴露于超过85 dB(A)的噪声中,约20%的工人暴露于超过90 dB(A)的噪声中。

结论

丹麦高风险行业的噪声水平仍然很高。相当一部分工人暴露于高于当前85 dB(A)阈值限值的噪声水平。对高噪声水平风险最高的工作场所随机样本中的工人使用全时剂量计进行持续的噪声暴露监测,可能有助于加强预防措施。这样一个计划将受益于工作场所的强制参与。

相似文献

1
Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline survey.
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;61(10):838-43. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.012757.
2
[Measurement of personal noise exposure in a cold rolling mill].
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;40(2):93-6.
3
Multiple work-related accidents: tracing the role of hearing status and noise exposure.
Occup Environ Med. 2009 May;66(5):319-24. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.037713. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
4
Occupational noise exposure and the risk of hypertension.
Epidemiology. 2013 Jan;24(1):135-42. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31826b7f76.
5
[Measurement and analysis of personal noise exposure in a city metro].
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Jul;41(4):311-3.
10
Characterizing noise and perceived work environment in a neurological intensive care unit.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Feb;123(2):747-56. doi: 10.1121/1.2822661.

引用本文的文献

2
Characterization of Anxiety-Like Behaviors and Neural Circuitry following Chronic Moderate Noise Exposure in Mice.
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Oct;131(10):107004. doi: 10.1289/EHP12532. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
3
Occupational Health and Safety Statistics as an Indicator of Worker Physical Health in South African Industry.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;19(3):1690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031690.
6
Typical noise exposure in daily life.
Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51 Suppl 1(0 1):S3-11. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.635316.
7
Longitudinal assessment of noise exposure in a cohort of construction workers.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Oct;55(8):906-16. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer050. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
8
Assessment of noise level in sundry processing and manufacturing industries in Ilorin metropolis, Nigeria.
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Mar;162(1-4):453-64. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0809-9. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
9
Occupational noise exposure and ischaemic heart disease mortality.
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Dec;63(12):813-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.026245. Epub 2006 Aug 15.
10
The triad of shift work, occupational noise, and physical workload and risk of coronary heart disease.
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Jun;63(6):378-86. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.022558.

本文引用的文献

1
Occupational exposure to noise and the attributable burden of hearing difficulties in Great Britain.
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Sep;59(9):634-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.9.634.
3
What is the effect of riskshaw noise on its driver?
J Pak Med Assoc. 2000 Apr;50(4):124-8.
4
Health and hazard surveillance--needs and perspectives.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25 Suppl 4:61-7.
6
Noise exposure profile among heavy equipment operators, associated laborers, and crane operators.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Nov;59(11):774-8. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010947.
7
Survey of commercial airline pilots' hearing loss.
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Feb;86(1):258. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.86.1.258.
9
A comprehensive strategy for the assessment of noise exposure and risk of hearing impairment.
Ann Occup Hyg. 1997 Aug;41(4):467-84. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4878(97)00007-0.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验