Suppr超能文献

日常生活中的典型噪声暴露。

Typical noise exposure in daily life.

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5355, USA.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51 Suppl 1(0 1):S3-11. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.635316.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify the distribution of typical noise levels present in daily life and identify factors associated with average sound levels.

DESIGN

This was an observational study.

STUDY SAMPLE

Participants (N = 286) were 20 to 68 year old men and women, drawn from the general population of Kalamazoo County, Michigan. A total of 73 000 person-hours of noise monitoring were conducted.

RESULTS

Median overall daily average levels were 79 and 77 dBLeq(A,8,equiv), with average levels exceeding EPA recommended levels for 70% of participants. Median levels were similar between the hours of 9 a.m. and 9 p.m., and varied little across days of the week. Gender, occupational classification, and history of occupational noise exposure were related to average noise levels, but age, educational attainment, and non-occupational noise exposures were not.

CONCLUSIONS

A large portion of the general population is exposed to noise levels that could result in long-term adverse effects on hearing. Gender and occupation were most strongly related to exposure, though most participants in this study had occupations that are not conventionally considered noisy.

摘要

目的

确定日常生活中典型噪声水平的分布,并确定与平均声级相关的因素。

设计

这是一项观察性研究。

研究样本

参与者(N=286)为 20 至 68 岁的男性和女性,来自密歇根州卡拉马祖县的一般人群。共进行了 73000 小时的噪声监测。

结果

总体日常平均水平中位数为 79 和 77dBLeq(A,8,等效),超过 EPA 建议水平的参与者比例为 70%。上午 9 点至晚上 9 点的中位数水平相似,且一周内变化不大。性别、职业分类和职业噪声暴露史与平均噪声水平有关,但年龄、教育程度和非职业噪声暴露无关。

结论

很大一部分普通人群暴露在可能导致长期听力不良影响的噪声水平下。性别和职业与暴露的关系最为密切,但这项研究中的大多数参与者从事的职业通常不被认为是嘈杂的。

相似文献

1
Typical noise exposure in daily life.
Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51 Suppl 1(0 1):S3-11. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.635316.
3
Determinants of early-stage hearing loss among a cohort of young workers with 16-year follow-up.
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jul;69(7):479-84. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100464. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
4
Occupation and the risk of hearing impairment--results from the Nord-Trøndelag study on hearing loss.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010 May;36(3):250-7. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2887. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
5
Occupational noise exposure and asymmetric hearing loss: Results from the HUNT population study in Norway.
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Jun;63(6):535-542. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23105. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
Evaluating the impact of occupational noise exposure on workplace fatal and nonfatal injuries in the U.S. (2006-2020).
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2025 Jan;263:114468. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114468. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
7
Multiple work-related accidents: tracing the role of hearing status and noise exposure.
Occup Environ Med. 2009 May;66(5):319-24. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.037713. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
9
Noise exposures of sugar cane mill workers in Guatemala.
Int J Audiol. 2020 Feb;59(sup1):S48-S53. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1690171. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The daily auditory environments of people with tinnitus.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10730-7.
2
Examining sound levels across different time scales measured from body-worn dosimetersa).
J Acoust Soc Am. 2025 Feb 1;157(2):1483-1499. doi: 10.1121/10.0035807.
3
Trends in prevalence of hearing loss in adults in the USA 1999-2018: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18426-9.
5
Daily sound exposure of hearing aids users during COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 13;11:1091706. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1091706. eCollection 2023.
8
Safe Listening at Venues and Events with Amplified Music - United States, 2022.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Mar 31;72(13):338-341. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7213a3.
10
Effects of Music Volume Preference on Endurance Exercise Performance.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Apr 27;7(2):35. doi: 10.3390/jfmk7020035.

本文引用的文献

2
Noise exposures of rural adolescents.
J Rural Health. 2011 Winter;27(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00306.x.
3
The effects of acoustic environment after traumatic noise exposure on hearing and outer hair cells.
Hear Res. 2009 Apr;250(1-2):10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
5
Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline survey.
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;61(10):838-43. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.012757.
6
Contributions of non-occupational activities to total noise exposure of construction workers.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Jul;48(5):463-73. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh041. Epub 2004 Jul 8.
7
Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift.
Hear Res. 2000 Jan;139(1-2):13-30. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00163-x.
8
Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods.
Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):726-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.5.726.
9
Temporary threshold shifts produced by wideband noise.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Aug;70(2):390-6. doi: 10.1121/1.386774.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验