Galbraith Austin, Abubakr Neamat Hassan
DMD Student School of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89557, USA.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89557, USA.
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 3;12(12):390. doi: 10.3390/dj12120390.
The development of composite resins has led to novel materials aimed at improving restoration longevity. This study evaluates the surface roughness of four tooth-colored restorative materials after thermal aging. Eighty Class V preparations were restored with Admira Fusion, Beautifil II, Equia Forte HT, and Filtek. The samples underwent thermocycling, and their surface roughness was measured with a 3D non-contact profilometer at 24 h post-restoration and after simulation for 1, 3, and 5 clinical years. Equia Forte HT showed the highest surface roughness and significant surface deterioration over time, while Admira Fusion maintained the lowest roughness across all intervals. Admira Fusion, Filtek, and Beautifil II demonstrated superior surface stability, with Equia Forte HT showing the least favorable performance.
复合树脂的发展催生了旨在提高修复体使用寿命的新型材料。本研究评估了四种牙齿颜色修复材料在热老化后的表面粗糙度。用Admira Fusion、Beautifil II、Equia Forte HT和Filtek修复了80个V类洞。对样本进行热循环处理,并在修复后24小时以及模拟1、3和5个临床年后,用三维非接触轮廓仪测量其表面粗糙度。Equia Forte HT显示出最高的表面粗糙度,且随着时间推移表面有明显劣化,而Admira Fusion在所有时间段内都保持了最低的粗糙度。Admira Fusion、Filtek和Beautifil II表现出卓越的表面稳定性,Equia Forte HT的性能最不理想。