Suppr超能文献

肺静脉电位对短阵快速起搏的反应。

Response of pulmonary vein potentials to burst pacing.

作者信息

Vijayaraman Pugazhendhi, Kok Lai Chow, Shepard Richard K, Wood Mark A, Ellenbogen Kenneth A

机构信息

Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia 23249, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2004 Oct;11(2):91-5. doi: 10.1023/B:JICE.0000042346.72974.8f.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein potentials recorded at the ostia of pulmonary veins (PV) are a useful guide for segmental isolation of the PV in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Even during coronary sinus pacing at 600 ms, atrial (A) and PV potentials can overlap in 50-60% of patients making the accurate identification of PV potentials very difficult.

METHODS

Nineteen patients (M:F 15:4) with paroxysmal AF underwent segmental isolation of one or more PV. Coronary sinus (CS) pacing was performed at cycle lengths of 600/550/500/450/400/350/300 ms and bipolar electrograms were recorded from the 10 or 20 pole Lasso catheter placed at the atrial-PV junction in 27 pulmonary veins. Stimulus (S) to A, S-PVP and A-PVP intervals were measured during CS pacing at the different cycle lengths at sweep speed of 200 mm/sec.

RESULTS

During CS pacing at 600 ms the A and PV potentials were significantly overlapped (A-PVP < or = 25 ms) in 15 of 27 (55%) veins. During pacing at 300 ms, the A and PV potentials were significantly separated (A-PVP > or = 25 ms) in 9 of the 15 veins where A and PV potentials overlapped and 21 of all 27 (78%) veins. In two patients pacing at 300 ms was associated with 2:1 conduction block from atrial to PV fascicle.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary sinus pacing at cycle length of 300 ms demonstrated better separation of A and PV potentials compared to pacing at 600 ms. This strategy is easier and less time consuming compared to extrastimuli testing. It also confirms that the electrophysiological properties of PV fascicles are different from that of the adjacent atrial musculature.

摘要

背景

在肺静脉(PV)开口处记录的肺静脉电位对于房颤(AF)患者肺静脉节段性隔离是一个有用的指导。即使在600毫秒的冠状窦起搏期间,50 - 60%的患者心房(A)电位和肺静脉电位会重叠,这使得准确识别肺静脉电位非常困难。

方法

19例阵发性房颤患者(男:女为15:4)接受了一个或多个肺静脉的节段性隔离。以600/550/500/450/400/350/300毫秒的周期长度进行冠状窦(CS)起搏,并从放置在27条肺静脉心房 - 肺静脉交界处的10极或20极套索导管记录双极电图。在以200毫米/秒的扫描速度进行不同周期长度的冠状窦起搏期间,测量刺激(S)到A、S - PVP和A - PVP间期。

结果

在600毫秒的冠状窦起搏期间,27条静脉中的15条(55%)静脉的A电位和肺静脉电位明显重叠(A - PVP≤25毫秒)。在300毫秒起搏期间,在A电位和肺静脉电位重叠的15条静脉中的9条以及所有27条静脉中的21条(78%)静脉中,A电位和肺静脉电位明显分离(A - PVP≥25毫秒)。在两名患者中,300毫秒起搏与从心房到肺静脉束支的2:1传导阻滞相关。

结论

与600毫秒起搏相比,300毫秒周期长度的冠状窦起搏显示出A电位和肺静脉电位更好的分离。与额外刺激测试相比,该策略更简单且耗时更少。它还证实了肺静脉束支的电生理特性与相邻心房肌组织不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验