Suppr超能文献

活化生长因子在腰椎融合术中的作用。

Role of activated growth factors in lumbar spinal fusions.

作者信息

Castro Frank P

机构信息

Tulane Health Sciences, New Orleans, Louisiana.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Oct;17(5):380-4. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000110342.54707.19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concentration of platelets into an activated growth factor (AGF) gel may stimulate graft consolidation into a fusion mass. Preoperative hemodilution and intraoperative clot activation may also reduce the overall blood loss. Consequently, the need for postoperative transfusions may also be reduced.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work was to report our experience with AGF platelet gels in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedures.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients between 1996 and 1999 undergoing one- and two-level TLIFs with AGF were compared with a consecutive series of TLIF patients who did not receive AGF. Sixty-two control subjects who did not receive AGF and 22 patients who received an AGF platelet gel were compared after 41 and 34 months of follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

On average, the AGF group required 18 minutes of additional preincision anesthesia (P = 0.0001). No statistical differences in the operative times, estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage, percentage of patients requiring a transfusion, or length of hospitalization were appreciated between the two groups. The 19% decrease in the arthrodesis rate of the AGF group, as compared with the control group, did not reach statistical significance. Platelet counts from the AGF platelet concentrates demonstrated an average 3.5-fold increase compared with preoperative serum levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The theoretical benefits of AGF platelet gel technology were not clinically appreciated. The cost of implementing this technology may therefore outweigh its theoretical benefits.

摘要

背景

将血小板浓缩成活性生长因子(AGF)凝胶可能会刺激移植物融合形成融合块。术前血液稀释和术中凝血激活也可能减少总体失血量。因此,术后输血的需求也可能降低。

目的

本研究旨在报告我们在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)中使用AGF血小板凝胶的经验。

方法

将1996年至1999年间连续接受单节段和双节段TLIF并使用AGF的患者系列与未接受AGF的连续TLIF患者系列进行比较。分别在随访41个月和34个月后,对62名未接受AGF的对照受试者和22名接受AGF血小板凝胶的患者进行比较。

结果

平均而言,AGF组需要额外18分钟的切口前麻醉(P = 0.0001)。两组在手术时间、估计失血量、术后引流量、需要输血的患者百分比或住院时间方面均无统计学差异。与对照组相比,AGF组的融合率降低了19%,但未达到统计学意义。AGF血小板浓缩物的血小板计数与术前血清水平相比平均增加了3.5倍。

结论

AGF血小板凝胶技术的理论优势在临床上未得到体现。因此,实施该技术的成本可能超过其理论优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验