Shusterman D
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section, Berkeley, California.
Arch Environ Health. 1992 Jan-Feb;47(1):76-87. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1992.9935948.
Environmental odor pollution problems generate a significant fraction of the publicly initiated complaints received by air pollution control districts. Such complaints can trigger a variety of enforcement activities under existing state and local statutes. However, because of the frequently transient timing of exposures, odor sources often elude successful abatement. Furthermore, because of the predominantly subjective nature of associated health complaints, air pollution control authorities may predicate their enforcement activities upon a judgment of the public health impact of the odor source. Noxious environmental odors may trigger symptoms by a variety of physiologic mechanisms, including exacerbation of underlying medical conditions, innate odor aversions, aversive conditioning phenomena, stress-induced illness, and possible pheromonal reactions. Whereas relatively consistent patterns of subjective symptoms have been reported among individuals who live near environmental odor sources, documentation of objective correlates to such symptoms would require as-yet unproven research tools. Therefore, given our current state of knowledge, any differential regulatory response to environmental odor pollution, which is based upon the distinction between community "annoyance reactions" and "health effects," is a matter of legal--not scientific--interpretation.
环境气味污染问题引发的公众投诉,在空气污染控制区收到的公众发起的投诉中占很大比例。此类投诉可能会引发现行州和地方法规规定的各种执法行动。然而,由于接触往往具有短暂性,气味源常常难以成功消除。此外,由于相关健康投诉主要具有主观性,空气污染控制当局可能会根据对气味源对公众健康影响的判断来开展执法行动。有害的环境气味可能通过多种生理机制引发症状,包括加重潜在疾病、先天性气味厌恶、厌恶条件反射现象、压力诱发疾病以及可能的信息素反应。虽然在居住在环境气味源附近的个体中报告了相对一致的主观症状模式,但要记录此类症状的客观关联因素,还需要尚未得到验证的研究工具。因此,鉴于我们目前的知识水平,基于社区“烦恼反应”与“健康影响”之间的区别对环境气味污染采取的任何差异化监管应对措施,都是一个法律解释问题,而非科学解释问题。