Suppr超能文献

眼压测量比较:戈德曼眼压计与托诺笔眼压计

Tonometry comparison: Goldmann versus Tono-Pen.

作者信息

Kooner K S, Cooksey J C, Barron J B, Zimmerman T J, Gupte R K, Wall J L

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State Medical Center, Shreveport.

出版信息

Ann Ophthalmol. 1992 Jan;24(1):29-36.

PMID:1543324
Abstract

Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometers were compared in 152 eyes of healthy subjects (Group A) and 69 eyes of patients after intraocular procedures (Group B). In Group A, the readings from both the tonometers showed no statistically significant difference in the 0 to 15mmHg range. However, the Tono-Pen values were lower in eyes with intraocular pressures between 16 and 30mmHg (P less than .0001). This questions the reliability of Tono-Pen as an adequate screening instrument. The correlation between the two instruments was acceptable in Group B (r = .89), indicating that the Tono-Pen may be used cautiously to determine intraocular pressure in postoperative patients.

摘要

对152只健康受试者的眼睛(A组)和69只接受眼内手术后患者的眼睛(B组)进行了Tono-Pen眼压计和Goldmann眼压计的比较。在A组中,两种眼压计的读数在0至15mmHg范围内无统计学显著差异。然而,眼压在16至30mmHg之间的眼睛中,Tono-Pen测量值较低(P小于0.0001)。这对Tono-Pen作为一种充分的筛查工具的可靠性提出了质疑。在B组中,两种仪器之间的相关性是可以接受的(r = 0.89),这表明在确定术后患者的眼压时,可以谨慎使用Tono-Pen。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验