Kooner K S, Cooksey J C, Barron J B, Zimmerman T J, Gupte R K, Wall J L
Department of Ophthalmology, Louisiana State Medical Center, Shreveport.
Ann Ophthalmol. 1992 Jan;24(1):29-36.
Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometers were compared in 152 eyes of healthy subjects (Group A) and 69 eyes of patients after intraocular procedures (Group B). In Group A, the readings from both the tonometers showed no statistically significant difference in the 0 to 15mmHg range. However, the Tono-Pen values were lower in eyes with intraocular pressures between 16 and 30mmHg (P less than .0001). This questions the reliability of Tono-Pen as an adequate screening instrument. The correlation between the two instruments was acceptable in Group B (r = .89), indicating that the Tono-Pen may be used cautiously to determine intraocular pressure in postoperative patients.
对152只健康受试者的眼睛(A组)和69只接受眼内手术后患者的眼睛(B组)进行了Tono-Pen眼压计和Goldmann眼压计的比较。在A组中,两种眼压计的读数在0至15mmHg范围内无统计学显著差异。然而,眼压在16至30mmHg之间的眼睛中,Tono-Pen测量值较低(P小于0.0001)。这对Tono-Pen作为一种充分的筛查工具的可靠性提出了质疑。在B组中,两种仪器之间的相关性是可以接受的(r = 0.89),这表明在确定术后患者的眼压时,可以谨慎使用Tono-Pen。