Peters David H, Mirchandani Gita G, Hansen Peter M
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Oct;19 Suppl 1:i5-i21. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh041.
The private health sector provides a significant portion of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in developing countries. Yet little is known about which strategies for intervening with private providers can improve quality or coverage of services. We conducted a systematic review of the literature through PubMed from 1980 to 2003 to assess the effectiveness of private sector strategies for SRH services in developing countries. The strategies examined were regulating, contracting, financing, franchising, social marketing, training and collaborating. Over 700 studies were examined, though most were descriptive papers, with only 71 meeting our inclusion criteria of having a private sector strategy for one or more SRH services and the measurement of an outcome in the provider or the beneficiary. Nearly all studies (96%) had at least one positive association between SRH and the private sector strategy. About three-quarters of the studies involved training private providers, though combinations of strategies tended to give better results. Maternity services were most commonly addressed (55% of studies), followed by prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (32%). Using study design to rate the strength of evidence, we found that the evidence about effectiveness of private sector strategies on SRH services is weak. Most studies did not use comparison groups, or they relied on cross-sectional designs. Nearly all studies examined short-term effects, largely measuring changes in providers rather than changes in health status or other effects on beneficiaries. Five studies with more robust designs (randomized controlled trials) demonstrated that contraceptive use could be increased through supporting private providers, and showed cases where the knowledge and practices of private providers could be improved through training, regulation and incentives. Although tools to work with the private sector offer considerable promise, without stronger research designs, key questions regarding their feasibility and impact remain unanswered.
在发展中国家,私营卫生部门提供了很大一部分性健康和生殖健康(SRH)服务。然而,对于干预私营医疗服务提供者的哪些策略能够提高服务质量或扩大服务覆盖范围,人们却知之甚少。我们通过PubMed对1980年至2003年的文献进行了系统回顾,以评估发展中国家私营部门SRH服务策略的有效性。所考察的策略包括监管、签约、融资、特许经营、社会营销、培训和合作。共审查了700多项研究,不过大多数是描述性论文,只有71篇符合我们的纳入标准,即针对一项或多项SRH服务制定了私营部门策略,并对提供者或受益者的一项结果进行了测量。几乎所有研究(96%)都发现SRH与私营部门策略之间至少存在一种正相关关系。约四分之三的研究涉及培训私营医疗服务提供者,不过多种策略结合往往能产生更好的效果。产科服务是最常涉及的领域(占研究的55%),其次是性传播疾病的预防和治疗(占32%)。利用研究设计来评估证据的强度,我们发现关于私营部门策略对SRH服务有效性的证据很薄弱。大多数研究没有使用对照组,或者依赖横断面设计。几乎所有研究都考察了短期效果,主要衡量的是提供者的变化,而非健康状况的变化或对受益者的其他影响。五项设计更为严谨的研究(随机对照试验)表明,通过支持私营医疗服务提供者可以增加避孕药具的使用,并显示出通过培训、监管和激励措施可以改善私营医疗服务提供者的知识和实践的案例。尽管与私营部门合作的工具前景广阔,但由于缺乏更有力的研究设计,关于其可行性和影响的关键问题仍未得到解答。