• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流行病学研究设计。

Epidemiological study designs.

作者信息

Diomidus Marianna

机构信息

University of Athens, Faculty of Nursing, Lab. of Health Informatics, Goudi, Greece.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;65:126-35.

PMID:15460223
Abstract

This chapter illustrates the study designs most frequently encountered in the medical literature. In medical research, either subjects are observed or experiments are undertaken. Experiments involving humans are called trials. Experimental studies may also use animals and tissue, although we did not discuss them as a separate category; the comments pertaining to clinical trials are relevant to animal and tissue studies as well. Each type of study discussed has advantages and disadvantages. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are the most powerful designs possible in medical research, but they are often expensive and time-consuming. Well-designed observational studies can provide useful insights on disease causation, even though they do not constitute proof of causes. Cohort studies are best for studying the natural progression of disease or risk factors for disease; case-control studies are much quicker and less expensive. Cross-sectional studies provide a snapshot of a disease or condition at one time, and we must be cautious in inferring disease progression from them. Surveys, if properly done. are useful in obtaining current opinions and practices. Case-series studies should be used only to raise questions for further research.

摘要

本章阐述了医学文献中最常遇到的研究设计。在医学研究中,要么对受试者进行观察,要么开展实验。涉及人类的实验称为试验。实验研究也可能使用动物和组织,尽管我们没有将它们作为一个单独的类别进行讨论;与临床试验相关的评论同样适用于动物和组织研究。所讨论的每种研究类型都有其优缺点。随机对照临床试验是医学研究中最有效的设计,但它们通常成本高昂且耗时。设计良好的观察性研究可以提供有关疾病病因的有用见解,尽管它们并不构成病因的证据。队列研究最适合研究疾病的自然进展或疾病的风险因素;病例对照研究速度更快且成本更低。横断面研究在某一时刻提供疾病或状况的快照,我们在从这些研究推断疾病进展时必须谨慎。如果调查做得恰当,有助于获取当前的观点和做法。病例系列研究仅应用于提出进一步研究的问题。

相似文献

1
Epidemiological study designs.流行病学研究设计。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;65:126-35.
2
Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs.流行病学方法:观察性研究设计。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Oct;30(10):973-84. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.10.973.
3
Study designs in clinical research.临床研究中的研究设计。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2009;113(3):c218-21. doi: 10.1159/000235610. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding.观察性研究:研究设计、混杂因素及减少混杂策略的综述。
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May;63(5):691-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02056.x.
5
[Research methods in clinical cardiology (I). Types of basic designs. Observational studies in clinical cardiology (I)].[临床心脏病学研究方法(I)。基本设计类型。临床心脏病学中的观察性研究(I)]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 1996 Nov;49(11):837-51.
6
A review of cohort study design for cardiovascular nursing research.心血管护理研究队列研究设计述评。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):E1-9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181ada743.
7
Diet and cancer: the disconnect between epidemiology and randomized clinical trials.饮食与癌症:流行病学与随机临床试验之间的脱节
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun;14(6):1366-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0666.
8
[Research designs and levels of evidence].[研究设计与证据水平]
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2007 Apr;114(4):161-5.
9
From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.从随机对照试验到观察性研究。
Am J Med. 2009 Feb;122(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.030.
10
[Approach to epidemiological cohort designs].[流行病学队列设计方法]
Neurologia. 2004 Sep;19 Suppl 1:23-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Capsular Outcomes After Pediatric Cataract Surgery Without Intraocular Lens Implantation: Qualitative Classification and Quantitative Measurement.小儿白内障手术无人工晶状体植入后的囊膜结局:定性分类与定量测量
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e2993. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002993.