Suppr超能文献

促使团队进行沟通:一份促进手术室跨专业沟通的检查表的开发与试点实施

Getting teams to talk: development and pilot implementation of a checklist to promote interprofessional communication in the OR.

作者信息

Lingard L, Espin S, Rubin B, Whyte S, Colmenares M, Baker G R, Doran D, Grober E, Orser B, Bohnen J, Reznick R

机构信息

University of Toronto, Wilson Centre for Research in Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):340-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012377.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pilot studies of complex interventions such as a team checklist are an essential precursor to evaluating how these interventions affect quality and safety of care. We conducted a pilot implementation of a preoperative team communication checklist. The objectives of the study were to assess the feasibility of the checklist (that is, team members' willingness and ability to incorporate it into their work processes); to describe how the checklist tool was used by operating room (OR) teams; and to describe perceived functions of the checklist discussions.

METHODS

A checklist prototype was developed and OR team members were asked to implement it before 18 surgical procedures. A research assistant was present to prompt the participants, if necessary, to initiate each checklist discussion. Trained observers recorded ethnographic field notes and 11 brief feedback interviews were conducted. Observation and interview data were analyzed for trends.

RESULTS

The checklist was implemented by the OR team in all 18 study cases. The rate of team participation was 100% (33 vascular surgery team members). The checklist discussions lasted 1-6 minutes (mean 3.5) and most commonly took place in the OR before the patient's arrival. Perceived functions of the checklist discussions included provision of detailed case related information, confirmation of details, articulation of concerns or ambiguities, team building, education, and decision making. Participants consistently valued the checklist discussions. The most significant barrier to undertaking the team checklist was variability in team members' preoperative workflow patterns, which sometimes presented a challenge to bringing the entire team together.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative team checklist shows promise as a feasible and efficient tool that promotes information exchange and team cohesion. Further research is needed to determine the sustainability and generalizability of the checklist intervention, to fully integrate the checklist routine into workflow patterns, and to measure its impact on patient safety.

摘要

背景

对诸如团队核对清单等复杂干预措施进行试点研究,是评估这些干预措施如何影响医疗质量和安全的重要前提。我们对术前团队沟通核对清单进行了试点实施。本研究的目的是评估核对清单的可行性(即团队成员将其纳入工作流程的意愿和能力);描述手术室(OR)团队如何使用核对清单工具;以及描述核对清单讨论的感知功能。

方法

开发了一个核对清单原型,并要求OR团队成员在18台外科手术前实施该清单。如有必要,研究助理会在场提示参与者启动每次核对清单讨论。训练有素的观察员记录了人种学实地笔记,并进行了11次简短的反馈访谈。对观察和访谈数据进行了趋势分析。

结果

OR团队在所有18个研究案例中都实施了核对清单。团队参与率为100%(33名血管外科团队成员)。核对清单讨论持续1 - 6分钟(平均3.5分钟),最常见的是在患者到达手术室之前进行。核对清单讨论的感知功能包括提供详细的病例相关信息、确认细节、阐明担忧或模糊之处、团队建设、教育和决策。参与者一直重视核对清单讨论。实施团队核对清单的最大障碍是团队成员术前工作流程模式的差异,这有时给召集整个团队带来挑战。

结论

术前团队核对清单有望成为一种可行且高效的工具,可促进信息交流和团队凝聚力。需要进一步研究以确定核对清单干预措施的可持续性和可推广性,将核对清单常规操作完全融入工作流程模式,并衡量其对患者安全的影响。

相似文献

3
Towards better patient safety: WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in otorhinolaryngology.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;36(3):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02315.x.
4
Assessing the performance of surgical teams.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342977.84307.64.
6
A pilot study of the implementation of WHO surgical checklist in Finland: improvements in activities and communication.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Nov;55(10):1206-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02525.x. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
7
Bridging the communication gap in the operating room with medical team training.
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):770-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.018.
9
Evaluation of a preoperative team briefing: a new communication routine results in improved clinical practice.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):475-82. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.032326. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

5
Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) Education for Health Care Students: Assessment of a Training Program.
MedEdPORTAL. 2023 Jan 3;19:11293. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11293. eCollection 2023.
6
Surgical Teams' Attitudes About Surgical Safety and the Surgical Safety Checklist at 10 Years: .
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Jul 6;2(3):e075. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000075. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Who's Who in the Trauma Bay? Association between Wearing of Identification Jackets and Trauma Teamwork Performance: A Simulation Study.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):139-145. doi: 10.4103/jets.jets_168_21. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
9
SBAR-LA: SBAR Brief Assessment Rubric for Learner Assessment.
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Oct 18;17:11184. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11184. eCollection 2021.
10
Complexity and involvement as implementation challenges: results from a process analysis.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 23;21(1):1149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07090-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i85-90. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i85.
3
Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals.
Surgery. 2003 Jun;133(6):614-21. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.169.
4
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health.
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.
7
On error management: lessons from aviation.
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781.
8
Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado.
Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):261-71. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验