Vervliet Bram, Vansteenwegen Debora, Eelen Paul
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Learn Mem. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):555-8. doi: 10.1101/lm.77404.
In a human fear conditioning paradigm using the skin conductance response (SCR), participants were assigned to two groups. Following identical acquisition, group ABA (n = 16) was extinguished to a generalization stimulus (GS), whereas group AAB (n = 20) was extinguished to the conditioned stimulus (CS). At test, presenting the CS in group ABA yielded a strongly recovered SCR. Presenting the GS in group AAB, on the other hand, did not disrupt the effects of extinction. We conclude that extinguishing the CS (group AAB) is an efficient strategy to overcome the stimulus specificity of extinction observed otherwise (group ABA). Clinical implications are discussed.
在一项使用皮肤电传导反应(SCR)的人类恐惧条件反射范式中,参与者被分为两组。在相同的习得过程之后,ABA组(n = 16)接受针对泛化刺激(GS)的消退训练,而AAB组(n = 20)接受针对条件刺激(CS)的消退训练。在测试时,向ABA组呈现CS会产生强烈恢复的SCR。另一方面,向AAB组呈现GS并不会破坏消退的效果。我们得出结论,对CS进行消退训练(AAB组)是一种有效的策略,可以克服在其他情况下观察到的消退的刺激特异性(ABA组)。文中还讨论了其临床意义。