• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在初级保健领域开发一个网站。

Developing a Web site in primary care.

作者信息

Fetters Michael D, Ivankova Nataliya V, Ruffin Mack T, Creswell John W, Power Debra

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0708, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2004 Oct;36(9):651-9.

PMID:15467943
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

While content, navigability, and usability are essential qualities of effective Web sites, the health care literature contains limited discussion of these issues. This article describes how knowledge gained through focus groups, Web site searches, and individual interviews were used to develop and improve a health-related Web site.

METHODS

We conducted 10 focus groups and searches of existing Web sites in preparation for developing a Web site about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews to assess content, navigation, and usability of a new CRC Web site, using participants recruited from Michigan communities with a low incidence of CRC testing. Targeted participants were 50-70 years of age, had no prior experience with CRC testing, and had variable comfort levels with Internet use.

RESULTS

Existing CRC screening Web sites uniformly use user-directed navigation and have little variation in content. Our study participants stimulated revisions in content, navigation, and usability. Revised content factors included comprehension, utility, and appeal. Navigation changes focused on logical transition between sections. Usability changes included user focus and clarity of graphics/ text.

CONCLUSIONS

We found focus groups, Web site searches, and individual interviews useful in developing and testing content, navigation, and usability of a CRC screening Web site. These steps provide methodological procedures for developing and revising health-related Web sites.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管内容、可导航性和可用性是有效网站的基本特质,但医疗保健文献中对这些问题的讨论有限。本文描述了如何通过焦点小组、网站搜索以及个人访谈所获得的知识来开发和改进一个与健康相关的网站。

方法

为开发一个关于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的网站,我们开展了10个焦点小组讨论并对现有网站进行了搜索。我们对从密歇根州结直肠癌检测低发社区招募的参与者进行了30次深度访谈,以评估一个新的CRC网站的内容、导航和可用性。目标参与者年龄在50至70岁之间,此前没有CRC检测经验,并且对互联网使用的熟悉程度各不相同。

结果

现有的CRC筛查网站均采用用户导向型导航,内容差异不大。我们的研究参与者促使在内容、导航和可用性方面进行了修订。修订后的内容因素包括理解性、实用性和吸引力。导航方面的改变集中在各部分之间的逻辑过渡。可用性方面的改变包括以用户为中心以及图形/文本的清晰度。

结论

我们发现焦点小组、网站搜索和个人访谈对于开发和测试CRC筛查网站的内容、导航和可用性很有用。这些步骤为开发和修订与健康相关的网站提供了方法学程序。

相似文献

1
Developing a Web site in primary care.在初级保健领域开发一个网站。
Fam Med. 2004 Oct;36(9):651-9.
2
Primary care patients' understanding of colorectal cancer screening.基层医疗患者对结直肠癌筛查的理解。
Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.10.001. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
3
Colorectal cancer screening among Mexican Americans at a community clinic.社区诊所中墨西哥裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Mar;30(3):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.002.
4
Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查中的个性化导航
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S123-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817fdf46.
5
Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial.基于偏好的电子决策辅助工具促进结直肠癌筛查:一项随机对照试验的结果
Prev Med. 2007 Oct;45(4):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
6
Cancer and colorectal cancer: knowledge, beliefs, and screening preferences of a diverse patient population.癌症与结直肠癌:不同患者群体的知识、认知及筛查偏好
Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):341-7.
7
Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?知情决策与结直肠癌筛查:在初级保健中是否正在发生?
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817dc496.
8
Colorectal cancer screening: how to help patients comply.结直肠癌筛查:如何帮助患者依从
J Fam Pract. 2008 Jul;57(7):E2-7.
9
Colorectal cancer screening among Latinos from U.S. cities along the Texas-Mexico border.美国德克萨斯州与墨西哥边境沿线城市的拉丁裔人群的结直肠癌筛查
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Mar;19(2):195-206. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9085-6. Epub 2007 Nov 24.
10
Evaluating a teen STD prevention Web site.评估一个青少年性传播疾病预防网站。
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Sep;37(3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Are cancer-related decision aids appropriate for socially disadvantaged patients? A systematic review of US randomized controlled trials.与癌症相关的决策辅助工具对社会弱势患者是否适用?对美国随机对照试验的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jun 6;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0303-6.
2
Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff.社区实践环境中使用基于网络的交互式决策辅助工具进行结直肠癌筛查的感知障碍与促进因素:来自与基层医疗临床医生和医疗办公室工作人员焦点小组的研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 18;15(12):e286. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2914.
3
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices.
实现混合方法设计的整合——原则与实践。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
4
Decision Aid to Technologically Enhance Shared decision making (DATES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.技术增强共同决策的决策辅助工具(DATES):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Nov 11;14:381. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-381.
5
A web-based patient tool for preventive health: preliminary report.一种基于网络的预防性健康患者工具:初步报告。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2012 Oct 1;3(4):289-94. doi: 10.1177/2150131911436011. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
6
Factors influencing choices for colorectal cancer screening among previously unscreened African and Caucasian Americans: findings from a triangulation mixed methods investigation.影响既往未接受筛查的非裔美国人和白人美国人进行结直肠癌筛查选择的因素:一项三角测量混合方法调查的结果
J Community Health. 2009 Apr;34(2):79-89. doi: 10.1007/s10900-008-9133-5.