Zhu Keming, Achord Patrick D, Zhang Xiawei, Krogh-Jespersen Karsten, Goldman Alan S
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Oct 13;126(40):13044-53. doi: 10.1021/ja047356l.
The p-methoxy-substituted pincer-ligated iridium complexes, (MeO-(tBu)PCP)IrH(4) ((R)PCP = kappa(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(CH(2)PR(2))(2)) and (MeO-(iPr)PCP)IrH(4), are found to be highly effective catalysts for the dehydrogenation of alkanes (both with and without the use of sacrificial hydrogen acceptors). These complexes offer an interesting comparison with the recently reported bis-phosphinite "POCOP" ((R)POCOP = kappa(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(OPR(2))(2)) pincer-ligated catalysts, which also show catalytic activity higher than unsubstituted PCP analogues (Gottker-Schnetmann, I.; White, P.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1804). On the basis of nu(CO) values of the respective CO adducts, the MeO-PCP complexes appear to be more electron-rich than the parent PCP complexes, whereas the POCOP complexes appear to be more electron-poor. However, the MeO-PCP and POCOP ligands are calculated (DFT) to show effects in the same directions, relative to the parent PCP ligand, for the kinetics and thermodynamics of a broad range of reactions including the addition of C-H and H-H bonds and CO. In general, both ligands favor (relative to unsubstituted PCP) addition to the 14e (pincer)Ir fragments but disfavor addition to the 16e complexes (pincer)IrH(2) or (pincer)Ir(CO). These kinetic and thermodynamic effects are all largely attributable to the same electronic feature: O --> C(aryl) pi-donation, from the methoxy or phosphinito groups of the respective ligands. DFT calculations also indicate that the kinetics (but not the thermodynamics) of C-H addition to (pincer)Ir are favored by sigma-withdrawal from the phosphorus atoms. The high nu(CO) value of (POCOP)Ir(CO) is attributable to electrostatic effects, rather than decreased Ir-CO pi-donation or increased OC-Ir sigma-donation.
对甲氧基取代的钳形配位铱配合物,(MeO-(tBu)PCP)IrH(4)((R)PCP = κ(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(CH(2)PR(2))(2))和(MeO-(iPr)PCP)IrH(4),被发现是烷烃脱氢的高效催化剂(无论是否使用牺牲性氢受体)。这些配合物与最近报道的双亚膦酸酯“POCOP”((R)POCOP = κ(3)-C(6)H(3)-2,6-(OPR(2))(2))钳形配位催化剂形成有趣的对比,后者也显示出比未取代的PCP类似物更高的催化活性(戈特克 - 施内特曼,I.;怀特,P.;布鲁克哈特,M. 《美国化学会志》2004年,126卷,1804页)。基于各自CO加合物的ν(CO)值,MeO - PCP配合物似乎比母体PCP配合物电子密度更高,而POCOP配合物似乎电子密度更低。然而,通过密度泛函理论(DFT)计算表明,相对于母体PCP配体,MeO - PCP和POCOP配体在包括C - H和H - H键加成以及CO加成等一系列广泛反应的动力学和热力学方面显示出相同方向的影响。一般来说,相对于未取代的PCP,这两种配体都有利于加成到14e(钳形)Ir片段,但不利于加成到16e配合物(钳形)IrH(2)或(钳形)Ir(CO)。这些动力学和热力学效应在很大程度上都归因于相同的电子特征:分别来自各自配体的甲氧基或亚膦酸酯基的O→C(芳基)π - 给予。DFT计算还表明,从磷原子的σ - 吸电子有利于(钳形)Ir上C - H加成的动力学(但不是热力学)。(POCOP)Ir(CO)的高ν(CO)值归因于静电效应,而不是Ir - CO π - 给予的减少或OC - Ir σ - 给予的增加。