Ficarra Vincenzo, Novara Giacomo, Galfano Antonio, Artibani Walter
Cattedra e Divisione Clinicizzata di Urologia, Università di Verona, Ospedale Policlinico, Piazzale Ludovico Scuro, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Eur Urol. 2004 Nov;46(5):559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.002.
Several TNM staging system editions were published over the years for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Using a search strategy similar to the one used by the TNM process Subcommittee for "literature watch", we searched MEDLINE with the intent to critically analyze literature concerning the different TNM editions and the data regarding the optimal breakpoints to substratify localized RCC.
The electronic search was conducted as follows: "Neoplasm staging" [MeSH] AND "Carcinoma, Renal Cell" [MeSH]. At the end of a process of abstract analysis performed separately by three of the authors, 34 papers were included in the systematic review.
All the 34 selected papers were retrospective studies. According to the 1987 version of TNM classification, no paper showed statistically significant cancer-specific survival probability differences between stage I and stage II RCC. According to the 1997 TNM version, the results were controversial. While a few papers found significantly different cancer-specific survival rates between stage I and stage II RCC, several others failed to do so. With the aim to stratify patients with localized RCC, most of the papers proposed an ideal breakpoint ranging from 4.5 to 5.5 cm.
This literature review highlighted that a correct definition of the staging of organ-confined RCC was far from being achieved and provided an appropriate synopsis of the available data for further update of the TNM staging system.
多年来已发布了多个版本的肾细胞癌(RCC)TNM分期系统。我们采用了一种与TNM流程小组委员会用于“文献观察”的搜索策略相似的方法,检索MEDLINE,旨在批判性地分析有关不同TNM版本的文献以及关于对局限性RCC进行亚分层的最佳分界点的数据。
电子检索按以下方式进行:“肿瘤分期”[医学主题词] AND “癌,肾细胞”[医学主题词]。在三位作者分别进行的摘要分析过程结束时,34篇论文被纳入系统评价。
所选的34篇论文均为回顾性研究。根据1987年版TNM分类,没有论文显示I期和II期RCC之间的癌症特异性生存概率存在统计学上的显著差异。根据1997年TNM版本,结果存在争议。虽然一些论文发现I期和II期RCC之间的癌症特异性生存率有显著差异,但其他几篇论文未发现。为了对局限性RCC患者进行分层,大多数论文提出的理想分界点在4.5至5.5厘米之间。
这篇文献综述强调,对器官局限性RCC分期的正确定义远未实现,并为TNM分期系统的进一步更新提供了现有数据的适当概述。