Schreiber Shaul, Yoeli Naomi, Paz Gedalia, Barbash Gabriel I, Varssano David, Fertel Nurit, Hassner Avi, Drory Margalit, Halpern Pinchas
Department of Psychiatry, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Weizmann Street 6, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):359-66. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.05.003.
Since 9/11, hospitals and health authorities have been preparing medical response in case of various mass terror attacks. The experience of Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in treating suicide-bombing mass casualties served, in the time leading up to the war in Iraq, as a platform for launching a preparedness program for possible attacks with biological and chemical agents of mass destruction. Adapting Quarantelli's criteria on disaster mitigation to the "microinfrastructure" of the hospital, and including human behavior experts, we attempted to foster an interactive emergency management process that would deal with contingencies stemming from the potential hazards of chemical and biological (CB) weapons. The main objective of our work was to encourage an organization-wide communication network that could effectively address the contingent hazards unique to this unprecedented situation. A stratified assessment of needs, identification of unique dangers to first responders, and assignment of team-training sessions paved the way for program development. Empowerment through leadership and resilience training was introduced to emergency team leaders of all disciplines. Focal subject matters included proactive planning, problem-solving, informal horizontal and vertical communication, and coping through stress-management techniques. The outcome of this process was manifested in an "operation and people" orientation supporting a more effective and compatible emergency management. The aim of article is to describe this process and to point toward the need for a broad-spectrum view in such circumstances. Unlike military units, the civilian hospital staff at risk, expected to deal with CB casualties, requires adequate personal consideration to enable effective functioning. Issues remain to be addressed in the future. We believe that collaboration and sharing of knowledge, information, and expertise beyond the medical realm is imperative in assisting hospitals to expedite appropriate preparedness programs.
自9·11事件以来,医院和卫生当局一直在为应对各种大规模恐怖袭击做医疗应急准备。在伊拉克战争前夕,特拉维夫索拉斯基医疗中心治疗自杀式爆炸大规模伤亡者的经验,成为了启动针对可能的大规模杀伤性生物和化学制剂袭击的准备计划的平台。我们将夸兰特利的减灾标准应用于医院的“微观基础设施”,并纳入人类行为专家,试图建立一个互动式应急管理流程,以应对化学和生物(CB)武器潜在危害引发的突发事件。我们工作的主要目标是鼓励建立一个全组织范围的通信网络,以有效应对这种前所未有的情况所特有的突发危害。通过分层需求评估、识别急救人员面临的独特危险以及安排团队培训课程,为项目开发铺平了道路。我们向所有学科的应急小组组长引入了通过领导力和恢复力培训实现的赋权。重点主题包括积极主动的规划、问题解决、非正式的横向和纵向沟通,以及通过压力管理技巧进行应对。这一过程的结果体现在一种“运营与人员”导向中,支持更有效且更协调的应急管理。本文的目的是描述这一过程,并指出在这种情况下需要有广泛的视角。与军事单位不同,面临风险、预期要应对CB伤亡者的民用医院工作人员需要得到充分的个人关照,以便有效开展工作。未来仍有一些问题有待解决。我们认为,在医疗领域之外开展协作并分享知识、信息和专业技能,对于协助医院加快制定适当的准备计划至关重要。