Suppr超能文献

儿童沟通检查表能否区分自闭症儿童、多动症儿童和正常对照组?

Can the Children's Communication Checklist differentiate between children with autism, children with ADHD, and normal controls?

作者信息

Geurts Hilde M, Verté Sylvie, Oosterlaan Jaap, Roeyers Herbert, Hartman Catharina A, Mulder Erik J, Berckelaer-Onnes Ina A, Sergeant Joseph A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;45(8):1437-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00850.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Children's Communication Checklist (CCC; Bishop, 1998) is a questionnaire that was developed to measure pragmatic language use and may be completed by parents and teachers. Two studies are reported, which were designed to investigate: (1) whether children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) encounter pragmatic language problems in comparison with normal controls (NC), (2) whether children with ADHD and children with High Functioning Autism (HFA) can be differentiated using the CCC, (3) the usefulness of the CCC for parents and teachers in a clinical and in a research setting, and (4) the role of age in pragmatic language use in ADHD and HFA.

METHOD

In the first study (clinical sample) 50 children with ADHD, 50 children with HFA, and 50 NC were compared to each other using the CCC. In the second study (research sample) CCC data was gathered on 23 children with ADHD (without co-morbid disorders), 42 children with HFA, and 35 NC.

RESULTS

Compared to NC, children with HFA showed pragmatic deficits on all CCC scales. Children with ADHD demonstrated deficits compared to NC as well. Moreover, the ADHD and HFA groups differed from each other on most of the scales. Discriminant analyses showed that CCC scales were relevant for case identification in these samples. Furthermore, profiles of impairment seen in children with HFA and ADHD did not vary with age.

CONCLUSION

Pragmatic difficulties do occur in both HFA and ADHD. The present studies indicate that the CCC is a useful instrument to obtain information concerning pragmatic language use in both a clinical and a research setting. Although the information of parents is more tightly linked to the diagnosis, combining the information of both parent and teacher slightly improves case identification.

摘要

背景

儿童沟通检查表(CCC;Bishop,1998)是一种用于测量语用语言运用的问卷,可由家长和教师填写。本文报告了两项研究,旨在调查:(1)与正常对照组(NC)相比,注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童是否存在语用语言问题;(2)能否使用CCC区分ADHD儿童和高功能自闭症(HFA)儿童;(3)在临床和研究环境中,CCC对家长和教师的有用性;(4)年龄在ADHD和HFA语用语言运用中的作用。

方法

在第一项研究(临床样本)中,使用CCC对50名ADHD儿童、50名HFA儿童和50名NC儿童进行了相互比较。在第二项研究(研究样本)中,收集了23名无共病的ADHD儿童、42名HFA儿童和35名NC儿童的CCC数据。

结果

与NC相比,HFA儿童在所有CCC量表上均表现出语用缺陷。ADHD儿童与NC相比也表现出缺陷。此外,ADHD组和HFA组在大多数量表上彼此不同。判别分析表明,CCC量表与这些样本中的病例识别相关。此外,HFA和ADHD儿童的损伤特征并不随年龄而变化。

结论

HFA和ADHD儿童均存在语用困难。本研究表明,CCC是一种在临床和研究环境中获取有关语用语言运用信息的有用工具。尽管家长的信息与诊断联系更紧密,但结合家长和教师的信息可略微提高病例识别率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验