Kivimäki Mika, Ferrie Jane E, Head Jenny, Shipley Martin J, Vahtera Jussi, Marmot Michael G
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Nov;58(11):931-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.019026.
Organisational justice has been proposed as a new way to examine the impact of psychosocial work environment on employee health. This article studied the justice of interpersonal treatment by supervisors (the relational component of organisational justice) as a predictor of health.
Prospective cohort study. Phase 1 (1985-88) measured relational justice, job demands, job control, social support at work, effort-reward imbalance, and self rated health. Relational justice was assessed again at phase 2 (1989-90) and self rated health at phase 2 and phase 3 (1991-93).
20 civil service departments originally located in London.
10 308 civil servants (6895 men, 3413 women) aged 35-55.
Self rated health.
Men exposed to low justice at phase 1 or adverse change in justice between phase 1 and phase 2 were at higher risk of poor health at phase 2 and phase 3. A favourable change in justice was associated with reduced risk. Adjustment for other stress indicators had little effect on results. In women, low justice at phase 1 predicted poor health at phase 2 and phase 3 before but not after adjustment for other stress indicators. Adverse change in justice was associated with worse health prospects irrespective of adjustments.
The extent to which people are treated with justice in workplaces seems to predict their health independently of established stressors at work. Evidence on reduced health risk after favourable change in organisational justice implies a promising area for health interventions at workplace.
组织公正已被提议作为一种检验心理社会工作环境对员工健康影响的新方法。本文研究了上级人际对待的公正性(组织公正的关系成分)作为健康的预测因素。
前瞻性队列研究。第一阶段(1985 - 1988年)测量关系公正、工作要求、工作控制、工作中的社会支持、努力 - 回报失衡和自评健康状况。在第二阶段(1989 - 1990年)再次评估关系公正,并在第二阶段和第三阶段(1991 - 1993年)评估自评健康状况。
最初位于伦敦的20个公务员部门。
10308名年龄在35 - 55岁之间的公务员(6895名男性,3413名女性)。
自评健康状况。
在第一阶段经历低公正或在第一阶段和第二阶段之间公正状况出现不利变化的男性,在第二阶段和第三阶段健康状况不佳的风险更高。公正状况的有利变化与风险降低相关。对其他压力指标进行调整对结果影响不大。在女性中,第一阶段的低公正状况在调整其他压力指标之前可预测第二阶段和第三阶段的健康不佳,但调整之后则不能。公正状况的不利变化与更差的健康前景相关,无论是否进行调整。
在工作场所人们受到公正对待的程度似乎能独立于工作中既定的压力源预测他们的健康。组织公正出现有利变化后健康风险降低的证据表明工作场所健康干预有一个很有前景的领域。