Suppr超能文献

系统评价:黑人患者的抗高血压药物治疗

Systematic review: antihypertensive drug therapy in black patients.

作者信息

Brewster Lizzy M, van Montfrans Gert A, Kleijnen Jos

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2004 Oct 19;141(8):614-27. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-8-200410190-00009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension occurs more frequently and is generally more severe in black persons than in white persons, leading to excess morbidity and mortality.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the efficacy of different antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure, morbidity, and mortality in hypertensive black adults.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases were searched from their inception through November 2003: MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS (Literatura Latino-Americana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud), African Index Medicus, and the Cochrane Library. PubMed was also searched from September 2003 through March 2004. Searches were conducted without language restriction.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials of drugs versus placebo (blood pressure outcomes) or drugs versus placebo or other drugs (morbidity and mortality outcomes).

DATA EXTRACTION

2 reviewers independently extracted data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The efficacy of beta-blockers in reducing systolic blood pressure and the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in achieving diastolic blood pressure goals did not significantly differ from that of placebo (weighted mean difference for beta-blockers, -3.53 mm Hg [95% CI, -7.51 to 0.45 mm Hg]; relative risk for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 1.35 [CI, 0.81 to 2.26]). In the pooled analyses, other reviewed drugs (calcium-channel blockers, diuretics, central sympatholytics, alpha-blockers, and angiotensin II receptor blockers) were more effective than placebo in reducing blood pressure, but only calcium-channel blockers remained effective in all prespecified subgroups, including patients with a baseline diastolic blood pressure of 110 mm Hg or greater. Main morbidity and mortality outcomes did not differ significantly between treatment groups when drugs were combined to reach blood pressure goals. However, trial results indicated a greater occurrence of diabetes with diuretics and a higher risk for cardiovascular events with drug regimens that included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

LIMITATIONS

This meta-analysis evaluated the blood pressure lowering-efficacy of monotherapy only.

CONCLUSIONS

Drugs differ in their efficacy for reducing blood pressure in black patients, but there is no solid evidence that efficacy for reducing morbidity and mortality outcomes differs once patients achieve the blood pressure goal.

摘要

背景

高血压在黑人中比在白人中更频繁发生且通常更严重,导致更高的发病率和死亡率。

目的

系统评价不同降压药物在降低高血压成年黑人血压、发病率和死亡率方面的疗效。

数据来源

检索了以下数据库自建库至2003年11月的数据:医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区卫生科学文献数据库(LILACS)、非洲医学索引数据库以及考科蓝图书馆。还检索了2003年9月至2004年3月的PubMed。检索无语言限制。

研究选择

药物与安慰剂对照的随机对照试验(血压结果)以及药物与安慰剂或其他药物对照的随机对照试验(发病率和死亡率结果)。

数据提取

两名评价员独立提取数据。

数据综合

β受体阻滞剂降低收缩压的疗效以及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂实现舒张压目标的疗效与安慰剂相比无显著差异(β受体阻滞剂的加权平均差为-3.53 mmHg [95%可信区间,-7.51至0.45 mmHg];血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的相对危险度为1.35 [可信区间,0.81至2.26])。在汇总分析中,其他经评价的药物(钙通道阻滞剂、利尿剂、中枢性抗交感神经药、α受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂)在降低血压方面比安慰剂更有效,但只有钙通道阻滞剂在所有预先指定的亚组中仍有效,包括基线舒张压为110 mmHg或更高的患者。当联合使用药物达到血压目标时,各治疗组的主要发病率和死亡率结果无显著差异。然而,试验结果表明利尿剂导致糖尿病的发生率更高,而包含血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的药物治疗方案发生心血管事件的风险更高。

局限性

该荟萃分析仅评估了单药治疗的降压疗效。

结论

不同药物在降低黑人患者血压方面的疗效存在差异,但没有确凿证据表明一旦患者达到血压目标,在降低发病率和死亡率结果方面的疗效存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验