Suppr超能文献

血压降低对无明显既往脑血管疾病患者认知障碍和痴呆症发生发展的影响。

The effects of blood pressure lowering on development of cognitive impairment and dementia in patients without apparent prior cerebrovascular disease.

作者信息

McGuinness B, Todd S, Passmore P, Bullock R

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, UK, BT9 5 HP.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD004034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004034.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension and cognitive impairment are prevalent in older people. It is known that hypertension is a direct risk factor for vascular dementia and recent studies have suggested hypertension also impacts upon prevalence of Alzheimer's disease. The question is therefore whether treatment of hypertension lowers the rate of cognitive decline.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of blood pressure lowering treatments for the prevention of dementia and cognitive decline in patients with hypertension but no history of cerebrovascular disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The trials were identified through a search of CDCIG's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL on 27 April 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trials in which pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions to lower blood pressure were given for at least six months.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data. The following outcomes were assessed: incidence of dementia, cognitive change from baseline, blood pressure level, incidence and severity of side effects and quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials including 12,091 hypertensive subjects were identified. Average age was 72.8 years. Participants were recruited from industrialised countries. Mean blood pressure at entry across the studies was 170/84 mmHg. All trials instituted a stepped care approach to hypertension treatment, starting with a calcium-channel blocker, a diuretic or an angiotensin receptor blocker. The combined result of the three trials reporting incidence of dementia indicated no significant difference between treatment and placebo (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.69, 1.16). Blood pressure reduction resulted in a 11% relative risk reduction of dementia in patients with no prior cerebrovascular disease but this effect was not statistically significant (p = 0.38) and there was considerable heterogeneity between the trials. The combined results from the two trials reporting change in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) did not indicate a benefit from treatment (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) = 0.10, 95% CI -0.03, 0.23). Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were reduced significantly in the two trials assessing this outcome (WMD = -7.53, 95% CI -8.28, -6.77 for systolic blood pressure, WMD = -3.87, 95% CI -4.25, -3.50 for diastolic blood pressure). Two trials reported adverse effects requiring discontinuation of treatment and the combined results indicated a significant benefit from placebo (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). When analysed separately, however, more patients on placebo in SCOPE were likely to discontinue treatment due to side effects; the converse was true in SHEP 1991. Quality of life data could not be analysed in the three studies. There was difficulty with the control group in this review as many of the control subjects received antihypertensive treatment because their blood pressures exceeded pre-set values. In most cases the study became a comparison between the study drug against a usual antihypertensive regimen.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was no convincing evidence from the trials identified that blood pressure lowering prevents the development of dementia or cognitive impairment in hypertensive patients with no apparent prior cerebrovascular disease. There were significant problems identified with analysing the data, however, due to the number of patients lost to follow-up and the number of placebo patients given active treatment. This introduced bias. More robust results may be obtained by analysing one year data to reduce differential drop-out or by conducting a meta-analysis using individual patient data.

摘要

背景

高血压和认知障碍在老年人中普遍存在。已知高血压是血管性痴呆的直接危险因素,最近的研究表明高血压也会影响阿尔茨海默病的患病率。因此问题在于高血压治疗是否能降低认知功能衰退的发生率。

目的

评估降压治疗对预防无脑血管疾病病史的高血压患者发生痴呆和认知功能衰退的效果。

检索策略

通过检索2005年4月27日的CDCIG专业注册库、Cochrane中心对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)和护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)来确定试验。

入选标准

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,其中采用药理学或非药理学干预措施降低血压至少6个月。

数据收集与分析

两名独立的评价者评估试验质量并提取数据。评估了以下结局:痴呆的发生率、与基线相比的认知变化、血压水平、副作用的发生率和严重程度以及生活质量。

主要结果

确定了3项试验,共纳入12091名高血压患者。平均年龄为72.8岁。参与者来自工业化国家。各研究中入组时的平均血压为170/84 mmHg。所有试验均采用阶梯式高血压治疗方法,起始用药为钙通道阻滞剂、利尿剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂。3项报告痴呆发生率的试验的合并结果表明,治疗组与安慰剂组之间无显著差异(优势比(OR)=0.89,95%可信区间(CI)0.69,1.16)。血压降低使无既往脑血管疾病的患者发生痴呆的相对风险降低了11%,但这一效果无统计学意义(p = 0.38),且试验之间存在相当大的异质性。2项报告简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)变化的试验的合并结果未显示治疗有获益(加权均数差(WMD)=0.10,95%CI -0.03,0.23)。在评估这一结局的2项试验中,收缩压和舒张压水平均显著降低(收缩压WMD = -7.53,95%CI -8.28,-6.77;舒张压WMD = -3.87,95%CI -4.25,-3.50)。2项试验报告了需要停药的不良反应,合并结果表明安慰剂组有显著获益(OR = 1.18,95%CI 1.06,1.30)。然而,单独分析时,在“老年人收缩期高血压干预计划(SCOPE)”试验中,更多服用安慰剂的患者因副作用可能停药;而在“老年收缩期高血压计划(SHEP)1991”试验中情况则相反。3项研究中无法分析生活质量数据。本综述中的对照组存在问题,因为许多对照受试者因血压超过预设值而接受了降压治疗。在大多数情况下,研究变成了研究药物与常规降压方案之间的比较。

作者结论

在所确定的试验中,没有令人信服的证据表明降压可预防无明显既往脑血管疾病的高血压患者发生痴呆或认知障碍。然而,由于失访患者数量以及给予安慰剂患者接受活性治疗的数量,在分析数据时发现了显著问题。这引入了偏倚。通过分析一年的数据以减少差异失访或使用个体患者数据进行荟萃分析,可能会获得更可靠的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验