Lantéri-Minet M, Allain H, Nachit-Ouinekh F, Bentué-Ferrer D, Gilbert P, Schück S, El Hasnaoui A
Département d'Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, CHU de Nice.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2004 Oct;160(10):928-34. doi: 10.1016/s0035-3787(04)71074-7.
A survey (NOEMIE, Nouvel Observatoire Epidemiologique de la Migraine en Entreprise) was carried out in France in 17 occupational healthcare units in order to identify subjects suffering from migraine headache with the aim of guiding them towards a healthcare program. The data collected in the participating units are presented.
and patients. NOEMIE was a national cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study with a 6-month follow-up. Two groups of migraine sufferers (according to IHS criteria) were included and divided into two groups: subjects already managed for their migraine (group A) and subjects who had not sought healthcare for migraine for more than 12 months (group B). The main objective was to evaluate changes in the quality-of-life score (QVM) 6 months later.
At inclusion, the two groups were comparable for demographic features, history of migraine, and disease severity. A significant difference was observed between the two groups for frequency of attacks, disease management, and evaluation of treatment efficacy and of quality-of-life. At 6 months, patient satisfaction and quality-of-life were significantly improved (6 to 10 point improvement). For the 4753 reported attacks, 12.4 percent of the patients in group A required sick leave versus 10.9 percent in group B. Frequency of sick leave was considerably improved in both groups.
By identifying subjects suffering from migraine headache who had not sought specific medical care and advising them to seek medical management, the employee healthcare units improved the subjects' quality-of-life, promoted adequate medical management and reduced occupational consequences of migraine headache.
在法国的17个职业健康护理单位开展了一项调查(NOEMIE,企业偏头痛新流行病学观察),以识别患有偏头痛的患者,旨在引导他们参与一项医疗保健计划。呈现了参与单位收集的数据。
和患者。NOEMIE是一项全国性横断面观察性多中心研究,随访6个月。纳入了两组偏头痛患者(根据国际头痛协会标准)并分为两组:已接受偏头痛治疗的患者(A组)和超过12个月未寻求偏头痛医疗护理的患者(B组)。主要目的是评估6个月后生活质量评分(QVM)的变化。
纳入时,两组在人口统计学特征、偏头痛病史和疾病严重程度方面具有可比性。两组在发作频率、疾病管理、治疗疗效评估和生活质量评估方面存在显著差异。6个月时,患者满意度和生活质量显著改善(提高了6至10分)。在报告的4753次发作中,A组12.4%的患者需要病假,而B组为10.9%。两组的病假频率均有显著改善。
通过识别未寻求特定医疗护理的偏头痛患者并建议他们寻求医疗管理,员工健康护理单位改善了患者的生活质量,促进了适当的医疗管理,并减少了偏头痛的职业后果。