Suppr超能文献

对超自然现象信徒的推理。

Reasoning in believers in the paranormal.

作者信息

Lawrence Emma, Peters Emmanuelle

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Nov;192(11):727-33. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000144691.22135.d0.

Abstract

Reasoning biases have been identified in deluded patients, delusion-prone individuals, and believers in the paranormal. This study examined content-specific reasoning and delusional ideation in believers in the paranormal. A total of 174 members of the Society for Psychical Research completed a delusional ideation questionnaire and a deductive reasoning task. The reasoning statements were manipulated for congruency with paranormal beliefs. As predicted, individuals who reported a strong belief in the paranormal made more errors and displayed more delusional ideation than skeptical individuals. However, no differences were found with statements that were congruent with their belief system, confirming the domain-specificity of reasoning. This reasoning bias was limited to people who reported a belief in, rather than experience of, paranormal phenomena. These results suggest that reasoning abnormalities may have a causal role in the formation of unusual beliefs. The dissociation between experiences and beliefs implies that such abnormalities operate at the evaluative, rather than the perceptual, stage of processing.

摘要

在妄想症患者、易产生妄想的个体以及超自然现象信仰者中均发现了推理偏差。本研究考察了超自然现象信仰者中特定内容的推理和妄想观念。心灵研究协会的174名成员完成了一份妄想观念问卷和一项演绎推理任务。推理陈述根据与超自然信仰的一致性进行了调整。正如预期的那样,与持怀疑态度的个体相比,那些报告对超自然现象有强烈信仰的个体犯的错误更多,表现出更多的妄想观念。然而,对于与其信仰体系一致的陈述,未发现差异,这证实了推理的领域特异性。这种推理偏差仅限于那些报告相信超自然现象而非有过超自然现象体验的人。这些结果表明,推理异常可能在异常信念的形成中起因果作用。体验与信念之间的分离意味着这种异常在加工的评估阶段而非感知阶段起作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验