Laakso Maija-Liisa, Leinonen Lea, Lindblom Niki, Joutsiniemi Sirkka-Liisa, Kaski Markus
Rinnekoti Foundation, Sleep Research Centre, Kumputie 1, FIN-02980 Espoo, Finland.
Sleep Med. 2004 Nov;5(6):541-50. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2004.05.002.
We studied the applicability of wrist actigraphy to sleep-wake estimation in patients with motor handicaps.
Concomitant polysomnographic and actigraphic recordings (16-24 h) were compared in three groups: normally moving subjects with normal sleep (n=10), sleep-disordered subjects without motor handicaps (n=13) and sleep-disordered patients with different motor disabilities (n=16). The motor abilities of the subjects were determined by clinical evaluation using a grading scale from 0 to 10. Their actual daily activity was calculated from the recordings as average activity scores.
In the healthy subjects, the mean difference between actigraphic and polysomnographic total sleep estimation was negligible (-1 min), while in both sleep-disordered groups, sleep was highly overestimated by actigraphy. There was a significant correlation between the motor ability score and the discrepancy between actigraphy and polysomnography, but individual data points were highly scattered. A more consistent correlation was found between the average activity score/min in actigrams and the discrepancy of actigraphic with polysomnographic total sleep estimation (Spearman's r=-0.58, P=0.0001, n=39). When the recordings with very low average activity score were rejected from the analyses (two patients without and six with motor handicaps), the overestimation of sleep by actigraphy was reduced but it still remained in both sleep-disordered groups. The mean differences of total sleep between actigraphy and polysomnography were 72 and 121 min and the rank order correlation coefficients 0.80 and 0.71 in patients without and with motor handicaps, respectively. The median discrepancy in total sleep estimation was 6% in both sleep-disordered groups.
In subjects with rudimentary motor abilities, a standard actigraphy can produce a signal, which is related to the amount of sleep scored in polysomnograms. The sleep parameters obtained by the two methods are not equal, however. The inspection of actigrams is more reliable than the clinical scaling of motor abilities in predicting the applicability of wrist actigraphy.
我们研究了腕部活动记录仪在运动障碍患者睡眠-觉醒评估中的适用性。
对三组患者同时进行多导睡眠图和活动记录仪记录(16 - 24小时):睡眠正常且活动正常的受试者(n = 10)、无运动障碍的睡眠障碍患者(n = 13)以及患有不同运动障碍的睡眠障碍患者(n = 16)。通过使用0至10级评分量表的临床评估来确定受试者的运动能力。根据记录计算他们的实际日常活动量,得出平均活动得分。
在健康受试者中,活动记录仪与多导睡眠图对总睡眠时间估计的平均差异可忽略不计(-1分钟),而在两个睡眠障碍组中,活动记录仪对睡眠时间的估计都明显偏高。运动能力得分与活动记录仪和多导睡眠图之间的差异存在显著相关性,但个体数据点分布较为分散。在活动记录仪记录中的平均活动得分/分钟与活动记录仪和多导睡眠图对总睡眠时间估计的差异之间发现了更一致的相关性(斯皮尔曼r = -0.58,P = 0.0001,n = 39)。当从分析中排除平均活动得分极低的记录时(2例无运动障碍患者和6例有运动障碍患者),活动记录仪对睡眠时间的高估有所减少,但在两个睡眠障碍组中仍然存在。在无运动障碍患者和有运动障碍患者中,活动记录仪与多导睡眠图之间总睡眠时间的平均差异分别为72分钟和121分钟,等级相关系数分别为0.80和0.71。两个睡眠障碍组中总睡眠时间估计的中位数差异均为6%。
在运动能力基本正常的受试者中,标准的活动记录仪可产生与多导睡眠图记录的睡眠时间相关的信号。然而,通过两种方法获得的睡眠参数并不相等。在预测腕部活动记录仪的适用性方面,检查活动记录仪记录比运动能力的临床评分更可靠。