Yale School of Nursing, West Haven, Connecticut.
Yale Schools of Nursing and Medicine, Beatrice Renfield Term Professor of Nursing, West Haven, Connecticut.
J Sleep Res. 2019 Apr;28(2):e12717. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12717. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Wrist-actigraphy is often used to measure sleep characteristics in a variety of populations, but discrepancies between actigraphic and polysomnographic measures have been noted in populations experiencing poor sleep quality. The purpose of this study is to examine the discrepancy between these measures and risk factors for discrepancy in people with heart failure using a novel index. We used sleep measures simultaneously recorded by actigraphy and polysomnography, and clinical data from a cross-sectional study of 155 patients with heart failure (age = 60.5 [16.1] years; 65.2% male) recruited from evidence-based heart failure disease management programmes. The discrepancy and consistency between the two measures were evaluated using Bland-Altman plots, intra-class correlations and a newly developed index that represents activity counts in wake episodes. Overall, participants had short total sleep time (327.7 [95.9] min) and poor sleep efficiency (71.3 [16.0]%) on polysomnography. The discrepancies between sleep measures were small in patients less than 60 years old, and there was excellent consistency (intra-class correlation = 0.81) compared with older patients who had poorer consistency (intra-class correlation = 0.53) on total sleep time. Higher daytime motor activity, poor sleep quality and more severe insomnia were associated with smaller discrepancies in older, but not younger, patients, and associations were more sensitively detected by the new index. These findings suggest the importance of aging, disability and co-morbidity that may influence motor activity from which sleep estimates are scored with actigraphy. The new index may be useful in identifying factors associated with the correspondence between actigraphy and polysomnography.
腕动描记法常用于测量各种人群的睡眠特征,但在睡眠质量差的人群中,发现了活动记录仪和多导睡眠图测量之间的差异。本研究旨在使用一种新指数,研究心力衰竭患者中这些测量值之间的差异及其差异的危险因素。我们同时使用活动记录仪和多导睡眠图记录的睡眠测量值以及来自心力衰竭(年龄 60.5 [16.1]岁;65.2%男性)的横断面研究的临床数据,该研究是从基于证据的心力衰竭疾病管理计划中招募的 155 名患者。使用 Bland-Altman 图、组内相关系数和代表清醒期活动计数的新指数评估两种测量方法之间的差异和一致性。总体而言,参与者在多导睡眠图上的总睡眠时间(327.7 [95.9]分钟)和睡眠效率(71.3 [16.0]%)都很短。在年龄小于 60 岁的患者中,睡眠测量值之间的差异较小,与年龄较大的患者相比具有极好的一致性(组内相关系数 0.81),后者的一致性较差(组内相关系数 0.53)。白天运动活动较多、睡眠质量较差和更严重的失眠与年龄较大的患者的差异较小有关,但新指数更敏感地检测到这种关联。这些发现表明,衰老、残疾和合并症等因素可能会影响使用活动记录仪评估的睡眠,这些因素可能会影响活动记录仪评估的睡眠,这些因素可能会影响活动记录仪评估的睡眠。新指数可能有助于确定与活动记录仪和多导睡眠图之间的对应关系相关的因素。