McKinley William, Meade Michelle A, Kirshblum Steven, Barnard Barbara
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1818-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.032.
To compare neurologic, medical, and functional outcomes of patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoing early (<24 h and 24-72 h) and late (>72 h) surgical spine intervention versus those treated nonsurgically.
Retrospective case series comparing outcomes by surgical and nonsurgical groups during acute care, rehabilitation, and at 1-year follow-up.
Multicenter National Spinal Cord Injury Database.
Consecutive patients with acute, nonpenetrating, traumatic SCI from 1995 to 2000, admitted in the first 24 hours after injury. Surgical spinal intervention was likely secondary to nature of injury and the need for spinal stabilization. Interventions Not applicable.
Changes in neurologic outcomes (motor and sensory levels, motor index score, American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale [AIS]), medical complications (pneumonia and atelectasis, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, rehospitalization), and functional outcomes (acute and rehabilitation length of stay [LOS], hospital charges, FIM instrument score, FIM motor efficiency scores).
Subjects in the early surgery group were more likely ( P <.05) to be women, have paraplegia, and have SCI caused by motor vehicle collisions. The nonsurgical group was more likely ( P <.05) to have an older mean age and more incomplete injuries. ASIA motor index improvements (from admission to 1-y follow-up) were more likely ( P <.05) in the nonsurgical groups, as compared with the surgical groups. Those with late surgery had significantly ( P <.05) increased acute care and total LOS and hospital charges along with higher incidence of pneumonia and atelectasis. No differences between groups were found for changes in neurologic levels, AIS grade, or FIM motor efficiency.
ASIA motor index improvements were noted in the nonsurgery group, though likely related to increased incompleteness of injuries within this group. Early versus late spinal surgery was associated with shorter LOS and reduced pulmonary complications, however, no differences in neurologic or functional improvements were noted between early or late surgical groups.
比较急性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者早期(<24小时和24 - 72小时)和晚期(>72小时)进行脊柱手术干预与非手术治疗的神经、医学及功能预后。
回顾性病例系列研究,比较急性护理、康复及1年随访期间手术组和非手术组的预后情况。
多中心国家脊髓损伤数据库。
1995年至2000年期间急性、非穿透性、创伤性SCI患者,伤后24小时内入院。脊柱手术干预可能因损伤性质及脊柱稳定需求而进行。干预措施不适用。
神经功能预后变化(运动和感觉平面、运动指数评分、美国脊髓损伤协会[ASIA]损伤分级量表[AIS])、医学并发症(肺炎和肺不张、深静脉血栓形成和肺栓塞、压疮、自主神经反射异常、再次住院)以及功能预后(急性和康复住院时长[LOS]、住院费用、FIM工具评分、FIM运动效率评分)。
早期手术组患者更有可能(P<.05)为女性、患有截瘫且由机动车碰撞导致脊髓损伤。非手术组更有可能(P<.05)平均年龄较大且损伤不完全。与手术组相比,非手术组ASIA运动指数改善(从入院到1年随访)的可能性更大(P<.05)。晚期手术患者的急性护理和总住院时长及住院费用显著增加(P<.05),同时肺炎和肺不张的发生率更高。各手术组之间在神经平面变化、AIS分级或FIM运动效率方面未发现差异。
非手术组ASIA运动指数有所改善,尽管可能与该组损伤不完全性增加有关。早期与晚期脊柱手术与较短的住院时长及减少的肺部并发症相关,然而,早期或晚期手术组在神经或功能改善方面未发现差异。