• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Lithostar体外冲击波碎石术:首批1000例患者。多伦多碎石术协会。

Lithostar extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 1,000 patients. Toronto Lithotripsy Associates.

作者信息

Psihramis K E, Jewett M A, Bombardier C, Caron D, Ryan M

机构信息

Toronto Lithotripsy/Urolithiasis Program, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 1992 Apr;147(4):1006-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37447-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37447-5
PMID:1552574
Abstract

To our knowledge this study of our first consecutive 1,000 patients treated with the Siemens Lithostar device is the largest prospective series reported to date. Treatment results were determined at 3, 12 and 24 months after completion of therapy. The results at 3 months are presented. Complete followup data were available on 801 patients: 674 with renal and 127 with ureteral calculi. Results were analyzed according to stone size, location and number. The average number of shocks per treatment was 3,804 and the retreatment rate was 18.6%. At 3 months the stone-free rate was determined by a plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder and plain tomograms for renal calculi, and by an excretory urogram for ureteral calculi. The stone-free rate was 52% for renal and 76% for ureteral calculi. The overall stone-free rate for all calculi was 55.7%. Success rate, defined as stone-free or asymptomatic residual fragments measuring 4 mm. or less, was 72% for renal and 83% for ureteral calculi. The overall success rate for all calculi was 73.9%.

摘要

据我们所知,这项对首批连续1000例使用西门子Lithostar设备治疗的患者的研究,是迄今为止报道的最大规模的前瞻性系列研究。治疗结果在治疗完成后的3个月、12个月和24个月时确定。本文呈现了3个月时的结果。801例患者有完整的随访数据:674例为肾结石患者,127例为输尿管结石患者。根据结石大小、位置和数量对结果进行分析。每次治疗的平均冲击波次数为3804次,再次治疗率为18.6%。3个月时,肾结石通过肾脏、输尿管和膀胱的平片以及肾结石的平扫断层扫描来确定结石清除率,输尿管结石则通过排泄性尿路造影来确定。肾结石的结石清除率为52%,输尿管结石为76%。所有结石的总体结石清除率为55.7%。成功率定义为结石清除或残留无症状碎片尺寸在4毫米及以下,肾结石的成功率为72%,输尿管结石为83%。所有结石的总体成功率为73.9%。

相似文献

1
Lithostar extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 1,000 patients. Toronto Lithotripsy Associates.Lithostar体外冲击波碎石术:首批1000例患者。多伦多碎石术协会。
J Urol. 1992 Apr;147(4):1006-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37447-5.
2
Low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar: treatment results with 19,962 renal and ureteral calculi.使用Lithostar进行低能量体外冲击波碎石术:19962例肾和输尿管结石的治疗结果
J Urol. 1993 Jun;149(6):1419-24. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36404-2.
3
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy with Lithostar lithotriptor.使用Lithostar碎石机进行体外冲击波碎石术。
Urology. 1992 Nov;40(5):430-4. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90457-8.
4
In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi.输尿管结石的原位体外冲击波碎石术
J Urol. 1990 Aug;144(2 Pt 1):253-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39425-9.
5
Lithostar extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children.儿童体外冲击波碎石术(Lithostar)
J Urol. 1990 Aug;144(2 Pt 2):489-91; discussion 492-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39499-5.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with ultrasound-guided lithostar plus.超声引导下的体外冲击波碎石术联合Lithostar plus设备
Eur Urol. 1992;21(3):192-4. doi: 10.1159/000474836.
7
[Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy using Lithostar--factors influencing actuarial residual stone rates].使用Lithostar的体外冲击波碎石术单一疗法——影响实际残余结石率的因素
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1995 Mar;41(3):171-7.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stone disease: clinical experience with the electromagnetic lithotriptor 'Lithostar'.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疾病:使用电磁碎石机“Lithostar”的临床经验
Eur Urol. 1989;16(1):7-11. doi: 10.1159/000471519.
9
Pediatric low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar.
J Urol. 1995 Feb;153(2):453-7. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199502000-00055.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: experience in treatment of 3,278 patients using the Siemens Lithostar and Lithostar Plus.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石:使用西门子Lithostar和Lithostar Plus治疗3278例患者的经验
J Urol. 1991 Mar;145(3):484-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38375-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Hounsfield Units and Factors Associated with Fragmentation of Renal Stones by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Computerized Tomography Study.体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石碎裂的 Hounsfield 单位评估及相关因素:一项计算机断层扫描研究。
Tomography. 2024 Jan 11;10(1):90-100. doi: 10.3390/tomography10010008.
2
Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.冲击波碎石术后单个输尿管上段结石患者无石率的预测简单实用的列线图。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1455-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2014-8. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
3
Management behaviors of the urology practitioners to the small lower calyceal stones: the results of a web-based survey.
泌尿外科医生对下盏小结石的处理行为:一项基于网络调查的结果
Urolithiasis. 2016 Jun;44(3):277-81. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0825-x. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.评估亨氏单位作为体外冲击波碎石术结果和结石成分的预测因素。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Feb;43(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0712-x. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
5
Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results.软性输尿管肾镜检查术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片:中期随访结果
Urolithiasis. 2014 Dec;42(6):533-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0691-y. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Outcome of shock wave lithotripsy as monotherapy for large solitary renal stones (>2 cm in size) without stenting.无支架置入的冲击波碎石术作为大型孤立性肾结石(直径>2cm)单一疗法的疗效
Indian J Urol. 2010 Jul;26(3):359-63. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.70568.
7
Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.肾结石冲击波碎石术治疗结果的可能预测变量评估。
Korean J Urol. 2010 Oct;51(10):713-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.713. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
8
Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy - the controversy continues.体外冲击波碎石术后下极肾结石的结石清除情况——争议仍在继续。
BMC Urol. 2003 Jan 21;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-3-1.