McMurray John J V
Department of Cardiology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, UK.
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2004 Sep;5 Suppl 1:S17-22. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2004.019.
Survival in patients with heart failure remains very poor, and is worse than that for most common cancers, including bowel cancer in men and breast cancer in women. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is not completely blocked by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. Blockade of the RAAS at the AT1-receptor has the theoretical benefit of more effective blockade of the actions of angiotensin II. ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) prevent the breakdown of bradykinin: this has been blamed for some of the unwanted effects of ACE-Is although bradykinin may have advantageous effects in heart failure. Consequently, ACE-Is and ARBs might be complementary or even additive treatments; recent trials have tested these hypotheses. The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme compared the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) candesartan (target dose 32 mg once daily) to placebo in three distinct but complementary populations of patients with symptomatic heart failure. These were: patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who were ACE-I-intolerant (CHARM-Alternative); patients with reduced LVEF who were being treated with ACE-Is (CHARM-Added); and patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function (CHARM-Preserved). There were substantial and statistically significant reductions in the primary composite end point (risk of cardiovascular death or hospital admission for heart failure) in CHARM-Alternative. This was also the case in CHARM-Added, supporting and extending the findings of Val-HeFT. In CHARM-Preserved, the effect of candesartan on the primary end point did not reach conventional statistical significance though hospital admission for heart failure was reduced significantly with candesartan. In the CHARM-Overall programme there was a statistically borderline reduction in all-cause mortality with a clear reduction in cardiovascular mortality. All-cause mortality was reduced by 12% in the two CHARM trials in patients with low LVEF. CHARM succeeded in answering a number of questions about the safety and efficacy of ARB use in heart failure. It showed evidence for a clinical benefit of candesartan both additive to and independent of ACE-I use. The benefits in terms of clinical outcomes were seen irrespective of beta-blocker usage. Benefits in patients with preserved LVEF were shown in the proportion of patients hospitalised with worsening heart failure and in overall number of admissions for heart failure. Candesartan had expected effects on blood pressure and renal function, emphasising the need for careful patient monitoring.
心力衰竭患者的生存率仍然很低,且比大多数常见癌症患者的生存率更差,包括男性的肠癌和女性的乳腺癌。肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统(RAAS)并未被血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂完全阻断。在AT1受体处阻断RAAS在理论上具有更有效阻断血管紧张素II作用的益处。ACE抑制剂(ACE-Is)可防止缓激肽分解:这被认为是ACE-Is一些不良作用的原因,尽管缓激肽在心力衰竭中可能具有有益作用。因此,ACE-Is和ARB可能是互补甚至相加的治疗方法;最近的试验对这些假设进行了验证。心力衰竭中坎地沙坦降低死亡率和发病率评估(CHARM)项目在三个不同但互补的有症状心力衰竭患者群体中,将血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)坎地沙坦(目标剂量为每日一次32毫克)与安慰剂进行了比较。这些群体分别是:左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低且不耐受ACE-I的患者(CHARM-替代组);正在接受ACE-Is治疗的LVEF降低的患者(CHARM-加用组);以及左心室收缩功能保留的患者(CHARM-保留组)。在CHARM-替代组中,主要复合终点(心血管死亡或因心力衰竭住院的风险)有显著且具有统计学意义的降低。CHARM-加用组也是如此,支持并扩展了Val-HeFT的研究结果。在CHARM-保留组中,坎地沙坦对主要终点的影响未达到传统统计学意义,尽管坎地沙坦显著降低了因心力衰竭住院的人数。在CHARM总体项目中,全因死亡率有统计学上接近显著的降低,心血管死亡率明显降低。在两项针对低LVEF患者的CHARM试验中,全因死亡率降低了12%。CHARM成功回答了一些关于ARB用于心力衰竭的安全性和有效性的问题。它显示了坎地沙坦在与ACE-I联合使用时具有相加作用且独立于ACE-I使用时均有临床益处的证据。无论是否使用β受体阻滞剂,在临床结局方面都能看到益处。在LVEF保留的患者中,益处体现在因心力衰竭恶化住院的患者比例以及心力衰竭住院总数方面。坎地沙坦对血压和肾功能有预期的影响,强调了对患者进行仔细监测的必要性。