Wong Tat Kong, Galster Patricia, Lau Tai Shing, Lutz Janita M, Marcus Carole L
Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong.
Sleep. 2004 Sep 15;27(6):1139-45. doi: 10.1093/sleep/27.6.1139.
Scoring of arousals in children is based on an extension of adult criteria, as defined by the American Sleep Disorders Association (ASDA). By this, a minimum duration of 3 seconds is required. A few recent studies utilized modified criteria for the study of children, with durations as short as 1 second. However, the validity and reliability of scoring these shorter arousals have never been verified. Based on studies in adults, we hypothesized that interscorer agreement for scoring arousals shorter than 3 seconds was poor.
Retrospective review of polysomnograms by 2 experienced sleep practitioners who independently scored arousals according to the ASDA 3-second criteria and modified duration criteria of 1 and 2 seconds.
Academic hospital.
20 polysomnographic studies from children aged 3 to 8 years with mild to severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, and 16 polysomnographic studies from normal children.
None.
The intraclass correlation coefficient for scoring ASDA arousals was 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.95), indicating excellent interscorer agreement. The intraclass correlation coefficient for scoring modified 1-second and 2-second arousals were 0.35 (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.61) and 0.42 (95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.65) respectively, indicating poor to fair interscorer agreement. Furthermore, modified 1-second and 2-second arousals accounted for less than 15% of all arousals scored.
We conclude that there is much poorer interscorer agreement for scoring arousals shorter than 3 seconds, when compared to the standard ASDA criteria. We propose that scoring of arousals in children should follow the standard ASDA criteria.
儿童觉醒评分基于美国睡眠障碍协会(ASDA)所定义的成人标准的扩展。据此,觉醒的最短持续时间需为3秒。最近有一些研究在儿童研究中采用了修改后的标准,持续时间短至1秒。然而,对这些较短觉醒进行评分的有效性和可靠性从未得到验证。基于对成人的研究,我们推测对于持续时间短于3秒的觉醒进行评分时,评分者间的一致性较差。
由2名经验丰富的睡眠专家对多导睡眠图进行回顾性分析,他们根据ASDA的3秒标准以及1秒和2秒的修改持续时间标准独立对觉醒进行评分。
学术医院。
20项来自3至8岁患有轻度至重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征儿童的多导睡眠图研究,以及16项来自正常儿童的多导睡眠图研究。
无。
对ASDA觉醒进行评分的组内相关系数为0.90(95%置信区间:0.81 - 0.95),表明评分者间一致性极佳。对修改后的1秒和2秒觉醒进行评分的组内相关系数分别为0.35(95%置信区间:0.02 - 0.61)和0.42(95%置信区间:0.12 - 0.65),表明评分者间一致性较差至一般。此外,修改后的1秒和2秒觉醒在所有评分的觉醒中占比不到15%。
我们得出结论,与标准的ASDA标准相比,对持续时间短于3秒的觉醒进行评分时,评分者间的一致性要差得多。我们建议儿童觉醒评分应遵循标准的ASDA标准。