Suppr超能文献

长期记忆的巩固:证据与其他解释

Consolidation of long-term memory: evidence and alternatives.

作者信息

Meeter Martijn, Murre Jaap M J

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2004 Nov;130(6):843-57. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.843.

Abstract

Memory loss in retrograde amnesia has long been held to be larger for recent periods than for remote periods, a pattern usually referred to as the Ribot gradient. One explanation for this gradient is consolidation of long-term memories. Several computational models of such a process have shown how consolidation can explain characteristics of amnesia, but they have not elucidated how consolidation must be envisaged. Here findings are reviewed that shed light on how consolidation may be implemented in the brain. Moreover, consolidation is contrasted with alternative theories of the Ribot gradient. Consolidation theory, multiple trace theory, and semantization can all handle some findings well but not others. Conclusive evidence for or against consolidation thus remains to be found.

摘要

长期以来,逆行性遗忘症中的记忆丧失被认为近期记忆的丧失程度大于远期记忆,这种模式通常被称为里博梯度。对这种梯度的一种解释是长期记忆的巩固。关于这一过程的几个计算模型已经展示了巩固如何能够解释遗忘症的特征,但它们尚未阐明必须如何设想巩固过程。这里回顾的研究结果揭示了巩固在大脑中可能是如何实现的。此外,还将巩固与里博梯度的其他理论进行了对比。巩固理论、多重痕迹理论和语义化理论都能很好地解释一些研究结果,但不能解释其他结果。因此,支持或反对巩固的决定性证据仍有待发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验