Meeter Martijn, Murre Jaap M J
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychol Bull. 2004 Nov;130(6):843-57. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.843.
Memory loss in retrograde amnesia has long been held to be larger for recent periods than for remote periods, a pattern usually referred to as the Ribot gradient. One explanation for this gradient is consolidation of long-term memories. Several computational models of such a process have shown how consolidation can explain characteristics of amnesia, but they have not elucidated how consolidation must be envisaged. Here findings are reviewed that shed light on how consolidation may be implemented in the brain. Moreover, consolidation is contrasted with alternative theories of the Ribot gradient. Consolidation theory, multiple trace theory, and semantization can all handle some findings well but not others. Conclusive evidence for or against consolidation thus remains to be found.
长期以来,逆行性遗忘症中的记忆丧失被认为近期记忆的丧失程度大于远期记忆,这种模式通常被称为里博梯度。对这种梯度的一种解释是长期记忆的巩固。关于这一过程的几个计算模型已经展示了巩固如何能够解释遗忘症的特征,但它们尚未阐明必须如何设想巩固过程。这里回顾的研究结果揭示了巩固在大脑中可能是如何实现的。此外,还将巩固与里博梯度的其他理论进行了对比。巩固理论、多重痕迹理论和语义化理论都能很好地解释一些研究结果,但不能解释其他结果。因此,支持或反对巩固的决定性证据仍有待发现。