Robichaud Patricia, Laberge Andrée, Allen Marie-France, Boutin Hélène, Rossi Claude, Lajoie Pierre, Boulet Louis-Philippe
Centre de pneumologie de l'Hôpital Laval, 2725, chemin Sainte-Foy, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada.
Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1495-501. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1495.
Emergency department (ED) visits for asthma may reflect poor asthma control, often due to insufficient asthma education and medical follow-up. However, few patients consulting an ED for asthma are referred for education.
To describe a model for automatic referral to educational interventions targeting patients consulting at the ED for acute asthma, to demonstrate how this model can be integrated into current care, and to increase referrals for asthma education.
The program combines a short ED-based educational intervention with the goal of motivating patients and their families to pursue an educational program with an automatic referral to an asthma education center (AEC) after agreement with ED physicians. The program was implemented in nine acute care centers with a high number of ED visits for asthma. The main study parameter was the number of patients referred to an AEC after 4 months of program implementation, as compared with 4 months before. In addition, we assessed potential barriers to successfully establishing the program.
In the first 4 months of the program, 1,104 patients were referred to an AEC, compared with 110 for the same period the year before; 106 patients (15%) patients could not be contacted, 114 patients (16.1%) refused the intervention, 488 patients (68.9%) made appointments, and 346 patients (48.9%, or 72.8% of scheduled patients) honored their appointments.
We describe a model of educational intervention for asthmatic patients consulting at the ED. We found that ED professionals can motivate patients to attend an asthma education program and that an automatic referral process is well accepted by ED staff. Such intervention can help to reduce asthma-related morbidity, but local barriers to implementation of such program should be addressed.
因哮喘前往急诊科(ED)就诊可能反映出哮喘控制不佳,这通常是由于哮喘教育和医疗随访不足所致。然而,很少有因哮喘到急诊科就诊的患者会被转诊接受教育。
描述一种针对因急性哮喘到急诊科就诊的患者自动转诊至教育干预措施的模式,展示该模式如何融入当前医疗服务,并增加哮喘教育的转诊人数。
该项目将基于急诊科的简短教育干预与激励患者及其家属参与教育项目的目标相结合,并在与急诊科医生达成一致后自动转诊至哮喘教育中心(AEC)。该项目在九个因哮喘急诊就诊人数较多的急性护理中心实施。主要研究参数是项目实施4个月后转诊至AEC的患者数量,并与之前4个月进行比较。此外,我们评估了成功建立该项目的潜在障碍。
在项目实施的前4个月,有1104名患者被转诊至AEC,而前一年同期为110名;106名患者(15%)无法联系到,114名患者(16.1%)拒绝干预,488名患者(68.9%)预约就诊,346名患者(4个月内预约就诊患者的48.9%,即72.8%)如约就诊。
我们描述了一种针对在急诊科就诊的哮喘患者的教育干预模式。我们发现急诊科专业人员能够激励患者参加哮喘教育项目,并且自动转诊流程得到了急诊科工作人员的广泛接受。这种干预有助于降低与哮喘相关的发病率,但应解决该项目实施过程中的当地障碍。