Labrecque M, Lavallée M, Beauchesne M F, Cartier A, Boulet L P
Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Chest Department, Université of Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Can Respir J. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(8):427-31. doi: 10.1155/2006/360735.
Asthma remains uncontrolled in a large number of asthmatic patients. Recent surveys have shown that a minority of asthmatic patients are referred to asthma educators. The objective of the present study was to assess the influence of increased access to spirometry in asthma education centres (AECs) on the rate of patient referrals to these centres by general practitioners.
A one-year, prospective, randomized, multicentric, parallel group study was conducted over two consecutive periods of six months each, with added spirometry being offered in the second six-month period to the experimental group. Ten AECs were enrolled in the project. An advertisement describing the AECs' services was sent by mail to a total of 303 general practitioners at the start of each period, inviting them to refer their patients. Measures of the frequency of medical referrals to the AECs were assessed for each period.
The group of AECs randomly selected for spirometry in the second six-month period received 48 medical referrals during the first period and 32 during the second one, following proposed spirometry. AECs that had not offered spirometry received five referrals during the first period and seven during the second period. One AEC withdrew a few weeks after the study began and others encountered administrative problems, reducing their ability to provide interventions.
Referral to AECs is not yet integrated into the primary care of asthma and offering more rapid access to spirometry in the AECs does not seem to be a significant incentive for such referrals.
大量哮喘患者的病情仍未得到有效控制。近期调查显示,只有少数哮喘患者会被转诊至哮喘教育中心。本研究的目的是评估在哮喘教育中心(AEC)增加肺功能测定服务对全科医生将患者转诊至这些中心的比例的影响。
开展了一项为期一年的前瞻性、随机、多中心平行组研究,分为两个连续的六个月周期,在第二个六个月周期为实验组提供额外的肺功能测定服务。共有10个哮喘教育中心参与了该项目。在每个周期开始时,通过邮件向总共303名全科医生发送了一份描述哮喘教育中心服务的广告,邀请他们转诊患者。对每个周期转诊至哮喘教育中心的医疗转诊频率进行了评估。
在第二个六个月周期被随机选择提供肺功能测定服务的哮喘教育中心组,在第一个周期收到48次医疗转诊,在提议提供肺功能测定服务后的第二个周期收到32次转诊。未提供肺功能测定服务的哮喘教育中心在第一个周期收到5次转诊,在第二个周期收到7次转诊。一个哮喘教育中心在研究开始几周后退出,其他中心遇到行政问题,降低了他们提供干预措施的能力。
转诊至哮喘教育中心尚未纳入哮喘的初级护理,在哮喘教育中心提供更快的肺功能测定服务似乎并不是促使此类转诊的重要诱因。