Ben-Dov I, Sietsema K E, Casaburi R, Wasserman K
Division of Respiratory and Critical Care, Physiology and Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California 90509.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Apr;145(4 Pt 1):776-81. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.4_Pt_1.776.
Periodic breathing (PB) during exercise in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with prominent oscillations (OSC) of O2 uptake (VO2). We hypothesized that the VO2 OSC represent OSC in true O2 exchange, resulting from concomitant cardiac output fluctuations and are not merely due to OSC of lung O2 stores. We compared the amplitude of the OSC of VO2, ventilation (VE), and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) in 17 patients with CHF and PB and in seven healthy control subjects who volitionally simulated PB. Subjects underwent an incremental and/or a constant work-rate exercise test. VE and VO2 were measured breath by breath. EELV change was estimated by summing the difference between inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes for each breath. The amplitude of the OSC, delta, is expressed as the ratio of the difference between the peak and nadir of the oscillating variable divided by its mean [delta = (peak - nadir)/mean]. In CHF, during incremental testing, the amplitude of the VE OSC was smaller than that of the VO2 OSC (delta VE = 49 +/- 15% [SD], delta VO2 = 63 +/- 25%, p less than 0.01). In contrast, during volitional PB in the control subjects, VE OSC were larger than VO2 OSC (delta VE = 48 +/- 12%, delta VO2 = 25 +/- 11%, p less than 0.01). This suggests that changing VE itself cannot account for the marked VO2 OSC seen in CHF. In the patients, EELV showed no systematic OSC, did not correlate with delta VO2, and was not significantly different from zero.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者运动期间的周期性呼吸(PB)与氧摄取(VO2)的显著波动(OSC)相关。我们假设VO2波动代表真正氧交换中的波动,由伴随的心输出量波动引起,而不仅仅是由于肺氧储备的波动。我们比较了17例CHF合并PB患者和7例自愿模拟PB的健康对照者VO2、通气量(VE)和呼气末肺容积(EELV)波动的幅度。受试者进行递增和/或恒定工作率运动试验。逐次测量VE和VO2。通过累加每次呼吸吸气和呼气潮气量之差来估计EELV变化。波动幅度δ表示为振荡变量峰值与最低点之差除以其平均值的比值[δ =(峰值 - 最低点)/平均值]。在CHF患者中,递增试验期间,VE波动幅度小于VO2波动幅度(δVE = 49±15%[标准差],δVO2 = 63±25%,p<0.01)。相反,在对照者自愿进行PB期间,VE波动大于VO2波动(δVE = 48±12%,δVO2 = 25±11%,p<0.01)。这表明VE本身的变化不能解释CHF中明显的VO2波动。在患者中,EELV未显示系统性波动,与δVO2无相关性,且与零无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)