Marseille Elliot, Dandona Lalit, Saba Joseph, McConnel Coline, Rollins Brandi, Gaist Paul, Lundberg Mattias, Over Mead, Bertozzi Stefano, Kahn James G
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 2):1993-2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00329.x.
To develop data collection methods suitable to obtain data to assess the costs, cost-efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of eight types of HIV prevention programs in five countries.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary data collection from prevention programs for 2002-2003 and prior years, in Uganda, South Africa, India, Mexico, and Russia.
This study consisted of a retrospective review of HIV prevention programs covering one to several years of data. Key variables include services delivered (outputs), quality indicators, and costs.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were collected by trained in-country teams during week-long site visits, by reviewing service and financial records and interviewing program managers and clients.
Preliminary data suggest that the unit cost of HIV prevention programs may be both higher and more variable than previous studies suggest.
A mix of standard data collection methods can be successfully implemented across different HIV prevention program types and countries. These methods can provide comprehensive services and cost data, which may carry valuable information for the allocation of HIV prevention resources.
开发适合获取数据的收集方法,以评估五个国家中八种类型的艾滋病病毒预防项目的成本、成本效率和成本效益。
数据来源/研究背景:2002 - 2003年及之前年份在乌干达、南非、印度、墨西哥和俄罗斯从预防项目中收集的原始数据。
本研究包括对涵盖一至数年数据的艾滋病病毒预防项目进行回顾性审查。关键变量包括提供的服务(产出)、质量指标和成本。
数据收集/提取方法:由经过培训的国内团队在为期一周的实地考察期间,通过审查服务和财务记录以及访谈项目管理人员和客户来收集数据。
初步数据表明,艾滋病病毒预防项目的单位成本可能比以往研究显示的更高且更具变数。
可以在不同类型的艾滋病病毒预防项目和国家成功实施多种标准数据收集方法。这些方法可以提供全面的服务和成本数据,这可能为艾滋病病毒预防资源的分配提供有价值的信息。