Somero George N
Department of Biological Sciences, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Oceanview Blvd., Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA.
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 Nov;139(3):321-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2004.05.003.
The pervasive influence of temperature on biological systems necessitates a suite of temperature--compensatory adaptations that span all levels of biological organization--from behavior to fine-scale molecular structure. Beginning about 50 years ago, physiological studies conducted with whole organisms or isolated tissues, by such pioneers of comparative thermal physiology as V.Ya. Alexandrov, T.H. Bullock, F.E.J. Fry, H. Precht, C.L. Prosser, and P.F. Scholander, began to document in detail the abilities of ectothermic animals to sustain relatively similar rates of metabolic activity at widely different temperatures of adaptation or acclimation. These studies naturally led to investigation of the roles played by enzymatic proteins in metabolic temperature compensation. Peter Hochachka's laboratory became an epicenter of this new focus in comparative physiology. The studies of the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) that he initiated as a PhD student at Duke University in the mid-1960s and continued for several years at the University of British Columbia laid much of the foundation for subsequent studies of protein adaptation to temperature. Studies of orthologs of LDH have revealed the importance of conserving kinetic properties (catalytic rate constants (kcat) and Michaelis-Menten constants (Km) and structural stability during adaptation to temperature, and recently have identified the types of amino acid substitutions causing this adaptive variation. The roles of pH and low-molecular-mass organic solutes (osmolytes) in conserving the functional and structural properties of enzymes also have been elucidated using LDH. These studies, begun in Peter Hochachka's laboratory almost 40 years ago, have been instrumental in the development of a conceptual framework for the study of biochemical adaptation, a field whose origin can be traced largely to his creative influences. This framework emphasizes the complementary roles of three "strategies" of adaptation: (1) changes in amino acid sequence that cause adaptive variation in the kinetic properties and stabilities of proteins, (2) shifts in concentrations of proteins, which are mediated through changes in gene expression and protein turnover; and (3) changes in the milieu in which proteins function, which conserve the intrinsic properties of proteins established by their primary structure and modulate protein activity in response to physiological needs. This theoretical framework has helped guide research in adaptational biochemistry for many years and now stands poised to play a critical role in the post-genomic era, as physiologists grapple with the challenge of integrating the wealth of new data on gene sequences (genome), gene expression (transcriptome and proteome), and metabolic profiles (metabolome) into a realistic physiological context that takes into account the evolutionary histories and environmental relationships of species.
温度对生物系统的广泛影响使得一系列温度补偿适应机制成为必要,这些机制涵盖了生物组织的各个层面——从行为到精细的分子结构。大约50年前,像V.Ya. 亚历山德罗夫、T.H. 布洛克、F.E.J. 弗莱、H. 普雷希特、C.L. 普罗瑟和P.F. 肖兰德等比较热生理学的先驱们,利用整个生物体或分离组织进行生理研究,开始详细记录变温动物在广泛不同的适应或驯化温度下维持相对相似代谢活动速率的能力。这些研究自然地引发了对酶蛋白在代谢温度补偿中所起作用的研究。彼得·霍查克的实验室成为了比较生理学这一新焦点的中心。他在20世纪60年代中期作为杜克大学的博士生开始,并在英属哥伦比亚大学持续了数年的乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)研究,为后续蛋白质对温度适应的研究奠定了许多基础。对LDH直系同源物的研究揭示了在适应温度过程中保持动力学特性(催化速率常数(kcat)和米氏常数(Km))以及结构稳定性的重要性,并且最近已经确定了导致这种适应性变化的氨基酸取代类型。利用LDH还阐明了pH值和低分子量有机溶质(渗透溶质)在保持酶的功能和结构特性方面的作用。这些始于近40年前彼得·霍查克实验室的研究,对生物化学适应研究概念框架的发展起到了重要作用,这个领域的起源很大程度上可以追溯到他的创造性影响。这个框架强调了三种适应“策略”的互补作用:(1)氨基酸序列的变化导致蛋白质动力学特性和稳定性的适应性变化;(2)蛋白质浓度的变化,这是通过基因表达和蛋白质周转变化介导的;(3)蛋白质发挥功能的环境变化,它保持了由蛋白质一级结构所确立的内在特性,并根据生理需求调节蛋白质活性。这个理论框架多年来一直帮助指导适应生物化学的研究,现在随着生理学家努力应对将关于基因序列(基因组)、基因表达(转录组和蛋白质组)以及代谢谱(代谢组)的大量新数据整合到一个考虑物种进化历史和环境关系的现实生理背景中的挑战,它有望在基因组时代之后发挥关键作用。